Jon Stewart's best moment wasn't on 'The Daily Show.' It was the day he eviscerated CNN.
"See, the thing is, we need your help. Right now, you're helping the politicians..."
Jon Stewart changed the way I think about TV news.
He's always been a hero of mine. As he finishes his last week at Comedy Central, I wanted to reflect on the moment he opened my eyes to the way the world really works.
The most important thing he ever taught me wasn't on "The Daily Show."
It was on another show entirely. A horrible show. A show that represented everything wrong with our country's political discourse. The show that was the precursor to all the worst things on cable news today.
It was the CNN show "Crossfire."
All GIFs via CNN's "Crossfire."
"Crossfire," a debate show where partisan hacks yelled past each other, was and is the epitome of everything wrong with cable news shows. But it was basically every other cable news show, just on steroids.
Prior to Stewart's appearance on "Crossfire," I had a pretty simplistic view of politics. My guys were good, their guys were bad, and there was nothing in between. Everything was their fault. Their side was lying to hurt America.
Jon Stewart helped me realize how wrong I was.
On Oct. 19, 2004, Jon Stewart broke "Crossfire." For good.
Stewart had a history of making fun of "Crossfire," as he did with all irresponsible television masquerading as journalism on every single TV network.
So when the guys at "Crossfire," Tucker Carlson and Paul Begala, invited him to be on their show, Stewart seized the opportunity. And I grabbed my bowl of popcorn, sat back on my couch, and watched, transfixed.
What followed was 14 glorious minutes of television that eloquently expressed everything that had been in my head about the TV media (see "Crossfire," above) that I hadn't yet been able to express coherently.
For 14 minutes, Stewart held the media accountable for not holding politicians and corporations accountable.
You know how the pundits on these shows yell shrill talking points at each other, respond to questions people didn't ask, and ignore each other, and then the host goes to commercial without fact-checking anyone?
Otherwise known as "every cable news show ever." Politicians count on that.
Stewart pulled back the curtain for the viewers while pulling the rug out from under the hosts of the show.
Stewart shone a big 'ol spotlight on a problem with the media that hadn't been addressed so directly before: TV media works under the concept of "fairness," he argued, meaning these networks give both sides of an issue equal time regardless of the validity of those positions or their level of expertise or authority on a subject.
And Stewart, like myself and millions of other Americans, was just plain sick of it.
In short...
It.
Was.
Glorious.
And throughout the segment, he reiterated a phrase that sticks in my brain even to this day:
Then a miracle happened. The best part of this whole story?
It happened a few months later. On Jan. 5, 2005, a couple months after Stewart's "Crossfire" appearance aired, the show was cancelled.
And there was much rejoicing — specifically in my living room, where I probably did some sort of awkward victory dance.
The NY Times reported that then-CNN President Jonathan Klein said its cancellation was in part due to Stewart's appearance.
"Mr. Klein specifically cited the criticism that the comedian Jon Stewart leveled at 'Crossfire' when he was a guest on the program during the presidential campaign. Mr. Stewart said that ranting partisan political shows on cable were 'hurting America.'
Mr. Klein said last night, 'I agree wholeheartedly with Jon Stewart's overall premise.'"
Disappointingly, CNN's president didn't agree as much as he originally implied. CNN brought back "Crossfire" again. And then cancelled it, thankfully, again. But its spirit lives on in every mediocre, divisive 24-hour news cycle.
Here's the thing. Cable news shouldn't be dividing us.
Jon Stewart's appearance on "Crossfire" clearly explained that the media should be informing us and holding the people in power accountable.
All this time, I had been blaming the other side for our problems. But the reality is they wouldn't be getting away with it if our media were functional.
I can't blame the foxes for eating the chickens they guard in the henhouse when the media has a responsibility to make sure they don't work there in the first place.
Every news network does it. CNN isn't the only guilty party. Fox News does it. MSNBC does it.
Even today, every network lets their panelists say what they want without consequences. In the name of "balance."
So how should cable news hosts do their jobs?
If the Democrat says the sky is green and the Republican says the sky is plaid, do you want the host to say, "We'll have to leave it there"?
Or do you want the host to say: "Actually, that is factually incorrect. You both are either lying or misinformed. I won't be bringing you back on my show if you mislead people again."
Jon Stewart opened my eyes. We don't need to get rid of the media. We need the media to their job.
Jon Stewart made me realize that the divide between most Americans is a false one.
Letting these pundits speak for us, allowing them to pigeonhole all of us as "left" or "right," should not be allowed to happen. All of us have shades of gray.
It's a media-created cartoon, meant to keep us fighting among ourselves while the folks upstairs get away with whatever they want.
We're better than that. And until we hold the media accountable, the media won't hold anyone else accountable.
Thank you for 15 great years, Jon. I know you don't think you eviscerated anything and that you didn't make a difference, but you did. Thank you for forcing the media to occasionally do something right. Thank you for being the voice of reason and sanity that we all needed.
- Jon Stewart promotes Wuhan lab-leak theory on 'Late Night' - Upworthy ›
- Jon Stewart takes on the Defense Department on burn pit dangers ›
- Jon Stewart delivers alarming prediction that Trump 'has a very good chance' of winning a 2024 election. - Upworthy ›
- 'Twitter Queen' Dionne Warwick opens up about her social media fame - Upworthy ›
- Jon Stewart is back and he's using his skills for the truth - Upworthy ›
- Ronny Chieng jokes about who is Asian - Upworthy ›
- Ronny Chieng jokes about who is Asian - Upworthy ›
- Mitch McConnell mocked Jon Stewart's work on behalf of 9/11 victims. Big mistake. - Upworthy ›
- Jon Stewart mourns the loss of his dog on 'The Daily Show' - Upworthy ›
- Ronan Farrow says just restarting your phone can stop hackers - Upworthy ›
- Investigative journalist reveals the simple way you can protect your phone from getting hacked - Upworthy ›






A woman is getting angry at her coworker.via
A man with tape over his mouth.via
A husband is angry with his wife. via 
a man sitting at a desk with his head on his arms Photo by
Can a warm cup of tea help you sleep better? If you believe it, then yes. Photo by 
Three women sit on a blanket in the park. 
Two women engaging in a pleasant conversation inside a coffee shop
Two men engaging in a peaceful disagreement.
Resurfaced video of French skier's groin incident has people giving the announcer a gold medal
"The boys took a beating on that one."
Downhill skiing is a sport rife with injuries, but not usually this kind.
A good commentator can make all the difference when watching sports, even when an event goes smoothly. But it's when something goes wrong that great announcers rise to the top. There's no better example of a great announcer in a surprise moment than when French skier Yannick Bertrand took a gate to the groin in a 2007 super-G race.
Competitive skiers fly down runs at incredible speeds, often exceeding 60 mph. Hitting something hard at that speed would definitely hurt, but hitting something hard with a particularly sensitive part of your body would be excruciating. So when Bertrand slammed right into a gate family-jewels-first, his high-pitched scream was unsurprising. What was surprising was the perfect commentary that immediately followed.
This is a clip you really just have to see and hear to fully appreciate:
- YouTube youtu.be
It's unclear who the announcer is, even after multiple Google inquiries, which is unfortunate because that gentleman deserves a medal. The commentary gets better with each repeated viewing, with highlights like:
"The gate the groin for Yannick Bertrand, and you could hear it. And if you're a man, you could feel it."
"Oh, the Frenchman. Oh-ho, monsieurrrrrr."
"The boys took a beating on that one."
"That guy needs a hug."
"Those are the moments that change your life if you're a man, I tell you what."
"When you crash through a gate, when you do it at high rate of speed, it's gonna hurt and it's going to leave a mark in most cases. And in this particular case, not the area where you want to leave a mark."
Imagine watching a man take a hit to the privates at 60 mph and having to make impromptu commentary straddling the line between professionalism and acknowledging the universal reality of what just happened. There are certain things you can't say on network television that you might feel compelled to say. There's a visceral element to this scenario that could easily be taken too far in the commentary, and the inherent humor element could be seen as insensitive and offensive if not handled just right.
The announcer nailed it. 10/10. No notes.
The clip frequently resurfaces during the Winter Olympic Games, though the incident didn't happen during an Olympic event. Yannick Bertrand was competing at the FIS World Cup super-G race in Kvitfjell, Norway in 2007, when the unfortunate accident occurred. Bertrand had competed at the Turin Olympics the year before, however, coming in 24th in the downhill and super-G events.
As painful as the gate to the groin clearly as, Bertrand did not appear to suffer any damage that kept him from the sport. In fact, he continued competing in international downhill and super-G races until 2014.
According to a 2018 study, Alpine skiing is a notoriously dangerous sport with a reported injury rate of 36.7 per 100 World Cup athletes per season. Of course, it's the knees and not the coin purse that are the most common casualty of ski racing, which we saw clearly in U.S. skier Lindsey Vonn's harrowing experiences at the 2026 Olympics. Vonn was competing with a torn ACL and ended up being helicoptered off of the mountain after an ugly crash that did additional damage to her legs, requiring multiple surgeries (though what caused the crash was reportedly unrelated to her ACL tear). Still, she says she has no regrets.
As Bertrand's return to the slopes shows, the risk of injury doesn't stop those who live for the thrill of victory, even when the agony of defeat hits them right in the rocks.