Baltimore college students create program to provide equal access to the arts

While many college students spend their campus years attending parties, drinking, and sleeping in, the group of young adults who competed in a recent tech for good competition are setting the bar high. Nearly 50 students representing 22 countries around the world recently participated in Red Bull Basement University, a four-day workshop in Toronto, Canada,…

Array
Madu (left) and Banerjee (right) with First Fridays Group participant, Amaru (middle)Photo credit: Courtesy of Kristofer Madu

While many college students spend their campus years attending parties, drinking, and sleeping in, the group of young adults who competed in a recent tech for good competition are setting the bar high.

Nearly 50 students representing 22 countries around the world recently participated in Red Bull Basement University, a four-day workshop in Toronto, Canada, comprised of lectures, keynote speakers, panels, and individual mentorship sessions with global tech leaders and inspirational entrepreneurs.


The event allowed the student teams to showcase and further develop their innovative business ideas, which were all created to help improve life on campus by driving positive change through technology.

Upworthy was able to speak with the team representing the United States, called First Fridays Group, which made it into the top 10 group of finalists. The founders, Kristofer Madu and Sindhu Banerjee, are students at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and developed an idea that promotes equal opportunity and access to the arts. The team explains how they came up with the idea for First Fridays Group, their vision for the future, and how technology will help them continue to improve the lives of others through their work.

Upworthy: Could you explain your idea and how you came up with it?

Kristofer Madu: We believe everyone deserves the opportunity to explore their creative passions. So we’re becoming the missing link between college students and their hidden creative talents. And that looks like easy skill acquisition in technical art form. To make that more practical sounding, consider art forms like DJ, photography, videography, music production. They’re expensive and they’re inaccessible for many who can’t afford them or even just perceive them as too hard.

Sindhu Banerjee: That’s where First Fridays comes in. What we’ve been doing is providing specialized one-on-one training with any college students. And so we bring them into our little studio. I provide them with one-on-one training, and through three 45-minute sessions, we’re able to teach them all the basics of DJ training. And then right after that, we have them perform in front of crowds of 500 people, and in the front row is their friends, all watching and recording. It’s a really transformative experience in which we give them self-confidence, we teach them a new skill, and we imbue them with the talent that they can now use for paid opportunities.

Upworthy: What is your background? If you’re teaching them, you obviously have DJ skills. But let’s say someone wants to learn more about photography. Do you guys have all those skills between the two of you, or are you bringing in outside mentors who are volunteering their time to do this?

Banerjee: Yeah, so we started off, the three of us… Duncan is our third member who’s in the United States. He has excellent photography skills. His dad has photographed for Prince. I’ve been deejaying for the past three years, and Kris has been rapping for the past eight. So together, we do have strong artistic abilities.

One-on-one trainings take a lot of time. And so the first step in trying to train as many people as possible, we brought on two more student DJs who have helped DJ more students. So at this point, we’ve trained over 40 people how to DJ.

But that’s the reason why we want to go into tech is because if we want to be teaching as many people as possible, we want to be able to have a platform to make it more tangible. The first 40 minutes of what I’m teaching anybody is the exact same stuff. It’s beat matching, it’s filtering, and then it’s putting songs together to build their set. That applies to every single training I do, and so to solve that inefficiency, we can make that standard on a digitized platform.

Madu: I want to stress that our platform is not at all limited to DJ, and we’ve provided opportunities for creatives in several mediums, whether it’s one-on-one DJ trainings, or photography and videography workshops, or even studio recording sessions for recording artists.

So I want to tell you a story of what exactly that’s looked like. Baltimore is a city with a lot of economic disparity. It’s one of the top 10 most impoverished cities in the United States. As a result, there are high degrees of separation between universities and the local communities that surround them, especially in Baltimore. This is a need that exists all around the country.

I want to talk about Mandy. Mandy is a Baltimore native and she goes to a local Baltimore school. She’s always had a passion for photography, but she’s struggled a lot to find outlets to practice those. So every single month we organize events, and Mandy, we’ve brought on our team as our event photographer. But in addition, through our booking agency…we connected Mandy to two paid contracts with Johns Hopkins University to gain economic opportunities through the passion that, before, she thought something like that was impossible.

Upworthy: So are the institutions or venues where these people are showcasing their skills volunteering their space? What does that business model look like?

Madu: We are creating a sustainable business, and thus far, it has been revenue generating. So we have revenue coming in from different streams. Our events are thrown every single month and they’re bringing in crowds of up to 500.

Banerjee: And just to add to that, we strive to be a least-cost provider. Companies throwing events similar to us charge $43 for a single ticket, and that would come with maybe one drink. We provide tickets at $5 to $8 each. And so we’re able to bring in all people from all sorts of background.

Upworthy: You briefly mentioned how you see tech coming into play, but do you have a vision for what your platform would look like? Would you offer, say, an intro to deejaying as a video for students?

Banerjee: It’s really simple. We offer a gamified process. So we want to follow a model where you’re rewarded points based on your skill and consistency. With those points, you can decide how to use them. If you want to use them in order to access more higher-level features, you can go for that. If you want to be able to perform at our events, you can also do that. And then the third one is bookings, at which point you apply to get booked by the First Fridays Group booking agency, and we look at your skill levels based on the points you’ve garnered, and if you’re good enough, then we’re going to go check you out. And if we check you out and you’re good enough, then you’re going to come perform for us.

Madu: We are essentially not just establishing an app, but we’re establishing a pipeline where someone that has no skill, no exposure, no experience, and they didn’t even know they had the interest, can go from a curious creative to a confident crowd favorite, never having to spend a single dollar of their own money. Let’s say they want to upgrade or do a subscription model. The cost, if you want to go out and become a DJ yourself, you’re spending more than a thousand dollars to actually get good the right way. And that can be boiled down to something affordable on the college student’s budget, as well as profit can be subsidized in order to make it available for those from lower income backgrounds. So that’s what drives us and that’s what that looks like in tech.

This interview has been edited for clarity and conciseness.

  • Tech expert explains why you ‘magically’ see ads for things you think about
    People are wondering how online advertising seems psychic. The answer is fascinating.Photo credit: Canva & X
    ,

    Tech expert explains why you ‘magically’ see ads for things you think about

    Algorithms don’t need to hear your thoughts to predict them.

    A number of years ago, people started to suspect their phones were listening to them. They’d “magically” see ads on Facebook or news websites for products they had barely mentioned in passing. Because our phones are always listening for “wake words” (like “OK Google” or “Hey Siri”), it was natural to grow suspicious that they were monitoring conversations and auctioning off that data to advertisers.

    The truth is, your phone is not always listening and scanning your conversations for ad triggers. However, countless people have reported seeing ads for things they’ve merely thought about.

    The reason this predictive advertising happens is fascinating, a little scary, and just a tad reassuring.

    “I can’t be the only one noticing this”

    Aakash Gupta writes about AI, tech, product growth, and more. He recently took on the challenge of explaining this freaky concept to a concerned Internet citizen.

    “I get how the phone can target ads by hearing and seeing me, but how is it showing me ads based on my thoughts? I can’t be the only one noticing this,” an X user wrote.

    Here’s Gupta’s explanation: It starts with a real-time auction every time you open an app or website that serves ads.

    “Every time you open a website or app, a real-time bidding auction fires in under 100 milliseconds,” Gupta wrote on X. “Your GPS coordinates, browsing history, device fingerprint, age, gender, income bracket, and hundreds of inferred interest categories get packaged into a ‘bid request’ and broadcast to hundreds of companies simultaneously. One company wins the ad slot. All of them keep the data.”

    Some estimates put the number of ads the average person sees in a given day between 4,000 and 10,000. In fact, most are almost invisible to us now. That’s why ad companies have to make them hyper-targeted.

    Gupta explained that your data isn’t only collected when you use a website. Some apps on your phone may pull your location data thousands of times per day, creating a detailed map of pretty much everywhere you go.

    So how does that lead to “telepathic” advertising? By figuring out what people who are almost exactly like you are interested in buying.

    “The algorithm doesn’t hear your thoughts. It compares your behavioral fingerprint against millions of similar profiles and predicts your next interest before you’re consciously aware of it,” Gupta wrote. “It makes hundreds of predictions per day. You ignore the misses. The five hits feel like telepathy.”

    Akash Muni, a software developer, explained it even more simply:

    “You are not unique. There are 10,000 people with your exact age, location, income bracket, browsing history, purchase pattern and social graph. When those 10,000 people started searching for running shoes, you hadn’t yet. But you will.”

    He said it’s called “predictive behavior modeling,” and that it has become eerily accurate.

    Famous case

    One famous case of this kind of modeling in advertising involved Target sending coupons for baby items to a pregnant teenager’s home. The only problem was that they identified her pregnancy so quickly that her parents didn’t even know yet.

    The New York Times wrote, “[A Target statistician was] able to identify about 25 products that, when analyzed together, allowed him to assign each shopper a ‘pregnancy prediction’ score. More important, he could also estimate her due date to within a small window, so Target could send coupons timed to very specific stages of her pregnancy.”

    Similar modeling is used in many ways, not just advertising. Some companies combine data on their employees with known trends and events (like layoffs or changes in HR policies) to predict when someone might quit or leave—even before they do.

    When it happens on your phone in a fraction of a second, it can be pretty shocking. In fact, the accuracy can be so spooky that some people refuse to believe the modeling is “predictive” at all.

    “Everyone is saying it just predicts.. now explain if I just happen to think about a random product which doesn’t basically interest me in any shape or form.. for example a conversation I just happened to have like 5 years ago.. and boom!.. here you go, ads flying in right after,” one X user wrote.

    “Yes, yesterday I was thinking of the cafe I once hoped for, and in the morning the first ad I saw was that cafe’s ad. How is it possible?” wrote another.

    As Gupta said, predictive modeling is wrong hundreds or thousands of times a day. But we don’t notice those ads for things we’re not interested in because we’re too focused on the ones that are frighteningly accurate.

    It’s hard to accept that our thoughts and choices aren’t as unique as we’d like to think they are

    Person holding a cell phone
    Some people have trouble believing that phones aren’t psychic. Photo credit: Canva

    It turns out humans are actually pretty predictable. Much of what we do and think is driven by our environment and the systems we live in. Those environments and systems can be tracked and measured with incredible efficiency.

    If there’s any solace to take in this relentless mining of our data, it’s that the whole system works because there are people out there just like us. There are countless others the same age, with similar family structures, interests, income brackets, and more. In another world, maybe we would all be friends!

    In the meantime, we can thank them for turning us on to that awesome pair of running shoes we didn’t even know we needed.

  • You were born with a playlist already in your soul: Why science says musicality is hardwired
    A toddler listens to music on giant headphonesPhoto credit: Canva
    ,

    You were born with a playlist already in your soul: Why science says musicality is hardwired

    We are born with a musical blueprint that might actually be older than language itself

    Every parent has seen that magical moment when a toddler, barely able to stand, starts bouncing perfectly in time to a catchy beat. It turns out that those rhythmic wobbles are not just cute accidents. According to a report from Neuroscience News, humans are actually born with a “music blueprint” that is hardwired into our biology.

    The evidence suggests that our musicality is an ancient capacity that might even predate the development of human language. As Brighter Side reported, music cognition professor Henkjan Honing has spent two decades researching how our brains process sound. His findings indicate that we do not just learn to like music through culture or upbringing. Instead, we are born with a dedicated capacity for it.

    Professor Honing explained that these abilities emerge spontaneously in infants. Babies respond to melody and rhythm without any formal instruction, which suggests that we come into the world with a biological predisposition for musical structures.

    To test how deep this goes, researchers even looked at other species. In one experiment, macaque monkeys were able to synchronize with complex rhythms, suggesting that the building blocks of music are shared across different branches of the evolutionary tree.

    While we often think of music as a hobby, for many it is a lifeline. According to data from Edison Research, the average member of Gen Z spends over four hours a day listening to music. About 86 percent of those young listeners told researchers that music is a primary tool for boosting their mood, and 61 percent said it helps support their mental health.

    This deep connection makes sense if music is a fundamental part of our species. Professor Honing noted that musicality is a combination of many traits, including our understanding of pitch, timing, and intervals. While songbirds and marine animals show some of these traits, humans have a unique and integrated system for it.

    The next time a certain song touches your heart or makes you want to dance, you can thank your own biology. It is not just a vibe. It is a part of what makes us human. As Professor Honing concluded, we are simply musical beings by nature.

    This article originally appeared earlier this year.

  • Tech expert shares the one message that actually convinces teens to reconsider their screentime
    Dino Ambrosi speaks at a school assemblyPhoto credit: Dino Ambrosi (used with permission)

    In a 2023 TEDx Talk at Laguna Blanca School, Dino Ambrosi made a startling revelation that perfectly underlines the big question of the smartphone era: What is my time worth? Ambrosi is the founder of Project Reboot and an expert at guiding teens and young adults to develop more empowering relationships with technology.

    Assuming the average person now lives to 90, after calculating the average time they spend sleeping, going to school, working, cooking, eating, doing chores, sleeping, and taking care of personal hygiene, today’s 18-year-olds have only 334 months of their adult lives to themselves.

    “How you spend this time will determine the quality of your life,” Ambrosi says. However, given today’s young people’s tech habits, most of those months will be spent staring at screens, leaving them with just 32 months to make their mark on the world. “Today, the average 18-year-old in the United States is on pace to spend 93% of their remaining free time looking at a screen,” Ambrosi says.

    dino ambrosi, teens and technology, smartphone addiction
    An 18-year-old’s remaining time, in months. via TEDx

    The idea that an entire generation will spend most of their free time in front of screens is chilling. However, the message has a silver lining. Sharing this information with young people can immediately impact how they spend their time.

    How to get teens to reduce their screentime

    Ambrosi says his work with Project Reboot through on-campus initiatives, school assemblies, and parent workshops has taught him that teens are more concerned about time wasted on their phones than the damage it may do to their mental health. Knowing which topic resonates can open the door to an effective dialogue about a topic that’s hard for many young people to discuss. When teens realize they are giving away their entire lives for free, they are more likely to reconsider their relationship with smartphones.

    “I actually don’t get through to a lot of teens, as well as when I help them realize the value of their time and then highlight the fact that that time is being stolen from them,” Ambrosi told Upworthy.

    A Common Sense Media study shows that, as of 2021, the average 13- to 18-year-old spent 8 hours and 39 minutes a day on entertainment screen time.

    “It’s important to get them to view time as their most valuable resource that they can use to invest in themselves or enjoy life and tick the boxes on their bucket list. I really want them to see that it’s something they should take control of and prioritize, because we’re all under the impression that social media is free, but it’s actually not. We just pay for it with our time.”

    dino ambrosi, project reboot, teens smartphones, screentime, tech companies, quality of life

    Dino Ambrosi speaks at a school assembly. via Dino Ambrosi (used with permission)

    Ambrosi believes that young people are less likely to give their time to tech companies for free when they understand the value of their time. “I find that kids really respond to that message because nobody wants to feel manipulated, right? And giving them that sense of being wronged, which I think they have been, by tech companies that are off operating on business models that are not aligned with their well-being, is important.”

    His approach to getting teens to rethink their smartphone use is similar to that of the Truth Initiative in that it educates young people about the nefarious tactics big tobacco companies used to lure and addict young people. In a way, big tech companies are doing the same thing by luring young people into their products, connecting them with friends and influencers, while providing a product that rearranges their brain chemistry.

    He also believes parents should be sympathetic and nonjudgmental when talking to young people about screen time because it’s a struggle that just about everyone faces and feels ashamed about. A little understanding will prevent them from shutting down the conversation altogether.

     

    How to reduce my screentime

    Ambrosi has some suggestions to help people reduce their screentime.

    The ClearSpace app

    ClearSpace forces you to take a breathing delay before using a distracting app. It also asks you to set a time limit and allows you to set a number of visits to the site per day. If you eclipse the number of visits, it sends a text to a friend saying you exceeded your budget. This can help people hold one another accountable for their screen time goals.

    Don’t sleep with your phone

    Ambrosi says to charge your phone far away from your bedside stand when you sleep and use an alarm clock to wake up. If you do have an alarm clock on your phone, set up an automation so that as soon as you turn off the alarm, it opens up an app like Flora or Forest and starts an hour-long timer that incentivizes you to be off your phone for the first hour of the day.

    “In my experience, if you can stay off screens for the last hour and the first hour of the day, the other 22 hours get a lot easier because you get the quality rest and sleep that you need to wake up fully charged, and now you’re more capable of being intentional because you are at your best,” Ambrosi told Upworthy.

    teens, smartphones, screentime, smartphones in bed, young man, mental health
    A teen boy looks at his phone in bed. Photo credit: Canva

    Keep apps in one place

    Ambrosi says to keep all of your social apps and logins on one device. “I try to designate a specific use for each device as much as possible,” he told Upworthy. “I try to keep all my social media time and all my entertainment on my phone as opposed to my computer because I want my computer to be a tool for work.”

    Even though there are significant challenges ahead for young people as they try to navigate a screen-based world while keeping them at a healthy distance, Ambrosi is optimistic about the future.

    “I’m really optimistic because I have seen in the last year, in particular, that the receptiveness of student audiences has increased by almost an order of magnitude. Kids are waking up to the fact that this is the problem. They want to have this conversation,” he told Upworthy. “Some clubs are starting to address this problem at several schools right now; from the talks I’ve given this semester alone, kids want to be involved in this conversation. They’re creating phone-free spaces on college and high school campuses by their own accord. I just think we have a huge potential to leverage this moment to move things in the right direction.”

    For more information on Ambrosi’s programs, visit ProjectReboot.School.

    This article originally appeared last year. It has been updated.

  • Educational space-themed pajamas have 5 glaring flaws any 6-year-old could spot
    Solar system PJs have some questionable science.Photo credit: Impressive_Stress808/Reddit

    Children are all naturally born scientists, with an incredible curiosity about the world around them. As adults, our job is to foster that spark so they can carry it throughout their lives.

    “Kids are sources of chaos and disorder. Get over that fact,” science communicator Neil deGrasse Tyson said on the Impact Theory podcast. “Where does the disorder come from? It’s because they are experimenting with their environment. Everything is new to them, everything. Your job is less to instill curiosity than to make sure you don’t squash what is already there.”

    Another job we have as adults is to make sure children are learning science correctly, which is why a toddler’s pajama shirt featuring the solar system is going viral on Reddit. It seems nobody at the clothing manufacturer took the time to review the science behind the graphic. In fact, it’s safe to say most kids as young as six could easily spot the flaws in the PJs.

    5 mistakes on the shirt that are easy to spot

    1. Jupiter appears on the shirt as spotted, rather than striped as it does through a telescope. Although it’s known for its Great Red Spot, here it looks more like a strawberry.
    2. Saturn appears spotted, like a chocolate chip cookie, rather than banded as it does in real life.
    3. Neptune, a giant ice planet, is shown as cratered, like Mercury.
    4. Mercury, conversely, is shown as a black-and-blue striped planet, more like Neptune.
    5. Uranus is shown as the largest planet in the graphic, but in reality, it is about the same size as Neptune.

    This is total conjecture, but it seems the graphic designer may have mislabeled Mercury as Neptune and Neptune as Mercury.

    The actual solar system

    solar system, planets, sun, earth, science
    The solar system. Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit commenters also pointed out the questionable font, noting that the “o,” with its cursive-style tail, makes the word “moon” look like “Meeh.” And, to get super nitpicky, if this is meant to be an unbiased look at the solar system, why is there only one moon on the shirt when there are hundreds in our solar system, depending on how they’re defined?

    solar system, school project, solar system mode, planets, sun
    A boy making a model of the solar system. Photo credit: Canva

    The PJs’ astronomically incorrect design even bothered those in the scientific community.

    “As a professional science communicator who works a lot with space at this age group, I am disappointed to see an adult get something wrong that any 6-year-old in the U.K. would correct,” Dr. Mark Gallaway told Newsweek.

    Although the shirt may be wrong in many ways, it could be a blessing in disguise. The parent who purchased these PJs now has an opportunity for a teachable moment. They can take the pajamas and compare them to the actual solar system to see where the designer got things right or wrong. It’s also a chance to bring up one of the sad truths about the universe: Pluto isn’t among the PJ planets, because it was demoted. Thanks, Neil deGrasse Tyson.

  • The little paper emoji on your phone has words on it and people are stunned at what it says
    A screen with variuos emojisPhoto credit: Canva

    Go ahead and pull up the paper emoji on your iPhone. The little white page, the one that looks completely blank from a distance. Now zoom in.

    There’s a letter in there. It’s addressed to someone named Katie. It’s signed by someone named John Appleseed. And it has been sitting inside that emoji, invisible to most people, since iOS 5.

    Instagram user Ella (@el_michelle1) posted a video zooming in on the emoji in December 2025, and it spread rapidly, racking up millions of views from people who could not quite believe they’d been sending that little icon around for years without knowing what was written on it. As LADbible reported in its coverage of the discovery, the reaction split neatly between people who immediately recognized the text and people who absolutely did not.

    Those who recognized it knew it right away. The letter contains the full text of Apple’s “Think Different” campaign, which ran from 1997 to 2002 and became one of the most celebrated advertising moments in the company’s history. It reads, in part: “Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently.” The letter ends: “Take care, John Appleseed.”

    Per Emojipedia, which documents the design details of every emoji across platforms, the text has been embedded in Apple’s paper emoji since the icon was introduced. It’s not just the paper emoji, either. As Creative Bloq noted, the same hidden text shows up in Apple’s notebook, memo, scroll, and clipboard emojis, and the receipt emoji contains a partial reference with the words “misfits,” “square pegs,” and “round holes” listed as line items.

    The name “John Appleseed” is Apple’s longstanding demo persona, used across its software and marketing materials for decades. As for Katie, nobody outside Apple knows for certain. The name varies slightly across emoji versions, appearing as “Kate,” “Katie,” or “Dear Katie” depending on which icon you’re looking at.

    It’s worth noting that Apple isn’t the only platform hiding things in its emoji designs. As Emojipedia documents, Samsung’s version of the clipboard emoji was once addressed “Dear Samsung,” and Facebook’s clipboard features what appears to be a small table of first names and dates, possibly birthdays.

    The response to Ella’s video captured something genuine: the strange pleasure of discovering that something you’ve looked at hundreds of times contained a message you never noticed. “Attention to detail is insane,” one commenter wrote. Another said: “I love when developers leave such tokens of their own in the things they built.” A third simply wanted to know: “Who is Katie?”

    Apple, characteristically, has not said.

    You can follow Ella (@el_michelle1) on Instagram for lifestyle content.

    This article originally appeared earlier this year.

  • The ‘one simple fact’ about life that gave Steve Jobs the courage to change the world
    Steve Jobs speaks to the Santa Clara Valley Historical Association. Photo credit: Photo via Santa Clara Valley Historical Association/YouTube

    Steve Jobs was one of the greatest minds of our time because he could anticipate what people would love before they even knew it themselves. By blending art and technology, he helped create era-defining products like the iPhone, iPod, iPad, and Macintosh computer. He also helped guide Pixar to change how we see movies.

    Jobs once described the epiphany that led him to embrace out-of-the-box thinking in a 1994 interview with the Santa Clara Valley Historical Association. The message was simple: you’re just as smart as the people who created the parameters of the modern world, so break them and see what you can create.

    The realization that changed his life

    In the interview, Jobs revealed:

    “When you grow up, you tend to get told that the world is the way it is and your life is just to live your life inside the world, try not to bash into the walls too much, try to have a nice family, have fun, save a little money. That’s a very limited life. Life can be much broader, once you discover one simple fact, and that is that everything around you that you call life was made up by people that were no smarter than you. And you can change it, you can influence it, you can build your own things that other people can use. Once you learn that, you’ll never be the same again.”

    “The minute that you understand that you can poke life and actually something will, you know if you push in, something will pop out the other side, that you can change it, you can mold it,” Jobs continued. “That’s maybe the most important thing. It’s to shake off this erroneous notion that life is there and you’re just gonna live in it, versus embrace it, change it, improve it, make your mark upon it.”

    steve jobs, iphone, jobs apple, apple iphone luanch, steve jobs conference, stete jobs speech,
    Steve Jobs holds anu00a0iPhone 4 at the 2010 Worldwide Developers Conference. Photou00a0via Matthew Yohe/Wikimedia Commons

    His advice applies to everyone

    Jobs’s realization is empowering because he argues that the people who came before us were no more special than we are today, and that we shouldn’t live our lives constrained by their limitations. Traditions from years ago may no longer serve us, and pathways to success that once worked may not be as fruitful today. Nobody knows how to live your life but you.

    He added that the average person has the intelligence to make big, significant changes that can improve the lives of many. In fact, with all the information and technology available today, individuals have far more tools than those who originally created the parameters by which we live.

    steve jobs, iphone, jobs apple, apple ipad luanch, steve jobs conference, stete jobs speech,
    Steve Jobs introducing the iPad in San Francisco on January 27,u00a02010. Photou00a0via Matt Buchanan/Wikimedia Commons

    “I think that’s very important, and however you learn that, once you learn it, you’ll want to change life and make it better, cause it’s kind of messed up, in a lot of ways,” Jobs said. “Once you learn that, you’ll never be the same again.”

    The beautiful thing about this realization is that Jobs wasn’t trying to gatekeep being a changemaker but instead invited everyone to the party. His breakthrough was an admission that the world is never finished; it is only a rough draft that we can either keep perfecting or throw away and start something completely different.

    Look around, what do you think we can improve that no one else has considered? That’s how you start thinking like Steve Jobs, and after we lost him in 2011, it’s clear we could use more people who see the world the way he did.

  • 64-year-old woman has been going blind for nearly 50 years. AI glasses just helped her ‘see’ again.
    An elderly woman driving a car. Photo credit: Canva

    When actress Kat Conner Sterling isn’t in front of the camera, she often finds herself behind it. With a social media following of hundreds of thousands to appease, Sterling has found a surprising star: her mother.

    Sterling’s mother, Charlotte, has been the focal point of many hit reels and posts, partly due to her colorful personality and partly because she has been blind since she was a teenager.

    According to Newsweek, Charlotte, 64, began losing her sight when she was just 17 due to a rare genetic disease. Her vision quickly deteriorated and she became legally blind before her eyesight worsened further with the onset of glaucoma and retinitis pigmentosa. Charlotte says she can only see shades of light and dark and sometimes make out the shapes of common objects, but otherwise, she is “totally blind.” Despite having many decades to adapt, it’s challenging for Charlotte to do many everyday tasks independently.

    In a recent TikTok post, however, Kat shared how her mother’s life was about to change in a big way thanks to a new pair of AI-powered glasses. In one video clip, Charlotte is shown getting dressed and visiting an eye doctor to have the glasses fitted and tested.

    “They never said blind people can’t be cute,” Charlotte says, as Kat helps her apply makeup.

    In the optometrist’s chair, Charlotte puts on the glasses and asks them to access the menu for the restaurant the women are planning to visit for lunch. She then asks the glasses to recommend the “best food to get there.”

    Meta’s AI glasses, along with other AI-powered eyewear, don’t enhance a person’s eyesight, per se. Instead, they feature a small camera that can take in images and videos from the outside world and translate those visuals into spoken text that only the wearer can hear. The glasses are also Bluetooth-enabled, allowing them to connect to a smartphone’s data connection to access the internet.

    In the next clip, mother and daughter visit a grocery store, where Charlotte holds a bag of chocolate chips and asks the glasses to read the packaging aloud. In the caption, Kat explains that her mom hasn’t been able to grocery shop independently in decades.

    “I was excited to think there might finally be something that could give me a slice of independence, rather than constantly relying on friends and family to help me understand what I’m seeing,” Charlotte tells Newsweek.

    After testing the technology on a few more items, Charlotte gives an enthusiastic thumbs-up. “Yay, yay, yay!” she says.

    Kat’s videos of her mother testing out the glasses have received millions of views and thousands of supportive comments. In a world where AI is polarizing at best and harmful at worst, many viewers found the footage incredible:

    “I despise AI for nonessential use, but I will always support AI usage for good. This is amazing!”

    “This is what AI should be used for. Not as a search engine but as medical assistance and medical research.”

    “My opinion on ai just changed”

    “This is the only use of ai i’ll accept, we should advocate for this more it really does have the potential to help so many people”

    “The only AI in our society should be helping us make life easier not harder. this is an amazing use for AI glasses”

    In another clip, Charlotte uses the glasses to get a description of the food served to her at a restaurant. She then has the glasses help her find the Diet Coke dispenser on a soda machine.

    She’s still getting used to the device and the technology, and so far is only scratching the surface of what’s possible.


    @katconnersterling_

    something cool. We did not expect this response. The messages, the stories, the encouragement… it’s been overwhelming in the best way. People working in disability programs want to share this with their teams. Others are reaching out hoping this could help them or someone they love. It’s reached way more people than we ever imagined. Definitely inspiring us to make more content! Stay tuned #momsoftiktok #ai #technology #disability #accessibility

    ♬ Wanderlust – Degraus

    An essay in Ability Magazine shares another blind user’s experience with Meta’s AI Ray-Ban glasses. Writer Gina Velasquez describes how the glasses help her orient herself in public, physical spaces:

    “Sitting in a waiting room at the massive Mount Sinai Hospital, the Meta glasses not only accurately identified the location as a hospital waiting room, it also described the furniture, the reception area and the patients sitting in chairs. When I asked for the location address, it answered and went on to tell me about the hospital wing I was in and other departments it contained. The Ray-Bans gave me more information about where I was than I’ve ever received from the companions who’ve helped me attend my appointments.”

    She also shares an anecdote from podcaster Ed Fischler, who uses AI glasses to “read” non-braille books to his three-year-old grandson—something that wouldn’t have been possible without the technology.

    Velasquez also notes that using a service called Be My Eyes, a real human volunteer can tap into the camera on her glasses to add a human touch by offering descriptions, assisting with visual tasks, and more.

    There are downsides, of course, as with any technology. AI has many limitations, including inaccuracies and hallucinations, so it may not be safe to rely on AI glasses to read prescription labels or help you cross a busy street, for example. Some users also have privacy concerns with companies like Meta having access to a camera they wear for several hours a day.

    But overall, AI glasses have received positive marks from the accessibility community.

    As for Kat, she’s thrilled for her mom. The two are extremely close, and it’s been incredibly fulfilling for Kat to see her mother regain even the slightest bit of independence in her daily life.

    Of their trip to the grocery store, Kat says, “It felt strange not standing right beside her reading everything, but it was such a meaningful and welcome change for both of us. I even left her in an aisle for a few minutes while she browsed on her own, with the glasses reading everything to her.”

    They hope the technology will continue to improve, becoming less clunky and more accurate over time. But for many people like Charlotte, the glasses are already making a positive difference.

  • Guy sparks debate by claiming he can tell you were born after 1995 if you say ‘VHS player’
    A few VHS tapes on a table.Photo credit: Photo Credit: Canva

    There are certain words, expressions, and references that, when used, can absolutely give away a person’s generation. If someone hears “Leave a message on my machine,” they might assume they’re dealing with a Boomer. On the other end of the spectrum, if someone says, “Hit me up on Snapchat,” one could place bets that it’s not a Boomer or even a Gen X-er talking.

    So when @Bittenhand19 took to Threads to state, “If I hear a person say ‘VHS player’ I know for a fact that person was born after 1995,” it got quite a lot of people weighing in.

    But let’s rewind for a quick technological history lesson.

    Way back in the 1950s (1956, to be exact), the first VCR, or Video Cassette Recorder, was released to the public. According to Christian Roemer’s article on the history of the VCR, “The first widely available VCR-like device was mainly intended for television networks, and it was incredibly expensive. Its 1956 price tag was $55,000, which converts to about half a million dollars in 2022. That’s right: the first VCR analogue was more expensive than a house!”

    Over the decades, the price tag dropped, and by the early 1970s, the first VCRs were hitting store shelves for consumers. But here’s where the confusion might come in for some. “The problem was that VCRs didn’t all use the same tapes at that point,” Roemer wrote. “Sony had Betamax, JVC had VHS, and a couple other stragglers bounced around too. Sort of like different video game systems, the different home video formats vied for market share and duked it out for a while. By the late 1970s, the public had spoken with their wallets, and VHS won the day. VCRs would eventually be in practically every home worldwide.”

    VCR, VHS, Tapes, 80s, 90s
    A VHS tape is pulled out of a VCR. Giphy Video VHSu00a0GIF

    Interestingly, a post titled “The Rise and Fall of the VCR: A Comprehensive History” on the DiJiFi website further explains:

    “Despite incorporating state-of-the-art sound and audio quality at the time, Betamax and VHS were at war. JVC developed and released the VHS in Japan in 1976, then released the product in the U.S. market a year later. While Sony’s Betamax machine was the first form of videotape hardware to host home videos, it was no match for JVC for several reasons.

    The VHS has a lighter build, resulting in cheaper manufacturing. The rectangular box could hold twice the amount of film tape, allowing it to play longer features that Betamax could not. While Sony’s Betamax had superior picture quality, the VHS took first place in terms of cost-effectiveness and convenience, making it the preferred home videotaping format.”

    Which brings us back to the Threads post. With nearly 2,000 likes and more than 300 comments, people most definitely had their own takes. Some jumped in to say the correct term was “tape player,” with one person specifically writing, “tape player, if you’re nasty.”

    Betamax, Sony, 1980s, Gen X, Boomer
    A Betamax sits on the floor. commons.wikimedia.org, File:Sony Betamax SL-C7E.jpg – Wikimedia Commons

    Many seem to know that the correct term is VCR, since VHS was merely a brand name (not unlike the way “tissues” and “Kleenex” are often used interchangeably).

    Another commenter went into greater detail, while also pointing out that someone born in 1995 understands the distinction: “1995 here. Wrong. All VCRs played VHS tapes, but not all VHS players were VCRs. There were dedicated VHS players that could only play tapes, but couldn’t record onto those tapes.”

    This commenter goes deep into the weeds: “You do not know this for a fact. They could possibly be someone who thought Betamax was a superior format for video cassette recorders. Or differentiating from their regular VHS VCR and one that did S-VHS, Video8, VHS-C, Hi8, PXL-2000, etc. etc. etc. Sometimes people have to make a distinction.”

    Some went the humorous route: “VHS player? That’s a VCR. Stands for…video…crambobulating…robot.”

    Perhaps even more interestingly, some claim it’s not a generational thing at all, but a geographical one: “Funny, if I hear a person say ‘VCR,’ I know they’re American.”

Pop Culture

Why didn’t people smile in old-timey photographs? Smiling meant something different back then.

Nature

Vet delivers best response after being told it’s ‘disgusting’ to let cats on the furniture

Kids

Toddler uses lawyer-like logic to make the case for taking candy from strangers

Wholesome

‘You better than that’: Door camera shows woman stopping package thief with tough love