There’s no 'right thing' to say to someone in need, according to new study.

When it comes to being a supportive person, don’t overthink it.

Nearly all of us have found ourselves in that situation where we’re confronted by someone in emotional distress.

Whether it’s a family member, close friend, or even a complete stranger, finding the right words to comfort someone in need can be elusive. Are we saying too much, not enough, or perhaps even being offensive despite our genuine desire to help?


Well, a new study from researchers at Wayne State University says we shouldn’t sweat it because there’s technically no “right” words or phrases to use when we want to be supportive. Instead, the important thing is communicating our intention to be supportive, rather than uttering any magical phrases.

Of course, support can mean different things in different situations. A “supportive” boss can affect your career trajectory, while being a supportive family member involves everything from financial to emotional to financial support.

Lead researcher Shawna Tanner built upon a 2008 study involving children, where they were asked to rate their reactions to several different supportive statements. According to that study, the kids varied widely in which statements they found most supportive.

Tanner expanded the new study to include college students and trained experts from a clinical training program. The results were largely similar and included several interesting findings.

For example:

A person’s response to a supportive statement generally has more to do with their own openness to receiving support and how they perceive the other person’s intent, rather than the actual words or phrases used.

In fact, Tanner said “clumsy statements” can often “do more harm than good.” So, simply showing up and expressing your sympathy is probably enough.

A discussion on Reddit drilled down on this point, as people often mistakenly think expressing empathy is important, when in reality, compassion is a far more effective tool. As one Redditor wrote:

People think commiserating on tragedy is the right response, but it is never as good as, "Wow, that sucks." What I mean is if someone tells you their mother has cancer no need to immediately share, "Oh, my mother also had cancer."

As the British Psychological Society noted, more research still needs to be done in real-world situations and across different cultures, but the new study is still a powerful insight into debunking some of the myths about how we can and should be our most supportive selves.

True

$200 billion of COVID-19 recovery funding is being used to bail out fossil fuel companies. These mayors are combatting this and instead investing in green jobs and a just recovery.

Learn more on how cities are taking action: c40.org/divest-invest


The recent passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg not only marked the end of an illustrious life of service to law and country, but the beginning of an unprecedented judicial nomination process. While Ginsburg's spot on the Supreme Court sits open, politicians and regular Americans alike argue over whether or not it should be filled immediately, basing their arguments on past practices and partisan points.

When a Supreme Court vacancy came up in February of 2016, nine months before the election, Senate Republicans led by Mitch McConnell refused to even take up a hearing to consider President Obama's pick for the seat, arguing that it was an election year and the people should have a say in who that seat goes to.

Four years later, a mere six weeks before the election, that reasoning has gone out the window as Senate Republicans race to get a nominee pushed through the approval process prior to election day. Now, they claim, because the Senate majority and President are of the same party, it makes sense to proceed with the nomination.

Keep Reading Show less
True

$200 billion of COVID-19 recovery funding is being used to bail out fossil fuel companies. These mayors are combatting this and instead investing in green jobs and a just recovery.

Learn more on how cities are taking action: c40.org/divest-invest


Former CBS News anchor Dan Rather has become a beloved voice of reason, knowledge, and experience for many Americans on social media the past few years. At 88, Rather has seen more than most of us, and as a journalist, he's had a front row seat as modern history has played out. He combines that lifetime of experience and perspective with an eloquence that hearkens to a time when eloquence mattered, he called us to our common American ideals with his book "What Unites Us," and he comforts many of is with his repeated message to stay "steady" through the turmoil the U.S. has been experiencing.

All of that is to say, when Dan Rather sounds the alarm, you know we've reached a critical historical moment.

Yesterday, President Trump again refused to commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election when directly asked if he would—yet another democratic norm being toppled. Afterward, Rather posted the following words of wisdom—and warning—to his nearly three million Facebook fans:


Keep Reading Show less

"Very nice!" It appears as though Kazakhstan's number one reporter, Borat Sagdiyev, is set to return to the big screen in the near future and the film's title is a sight to behold.

Reports show that the title submitted to the Writer's Guild of America, "Borat: Gift Of Pornographic Monkey To Vice Premiere Mikhael Pence To Make Benefit Recently Diminished Nation Of Kazakhstan" is even longer than the first film's, "Borat: Cultural Learnings Of America For Make Benefit Glorious Nation Of Kazakhstan."

As the title suggests, the film is expected to feature an encounter with U.S. Vice President Mike Pence as well as President Trump's TV lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.

Keep Reading Show less