There’s no 'right thing' to say to someone in need, according to new study.

When it comes to being a supportive person, don’t overthink it.

Nearly all of us have found ourselves in that situation where we’re confronted by someone in emotional distress.

Whether it’s a family member, close friend, or even a complete stranger, finding the right words to comfort someone in need can be elusive. Are we saying too much, not enough, or perhaps even being offensive despite our genuine desire to help?


Well, a new study from researchers at Wayne State University says we shouldn’t sweat it because there’s technically no “right” words or phrases to use when we want to be supportive. Instead, the important thing is communicating our intention to be supportive, rather than uttering any magical phrases.

Of course, support can mean different things in different situations. A “supportive” boss can affect your career trajectory, while being a supportive family member involves everything from financial to emotional to financial support.

Lead researcher Shawna Tanner built upon a 2008 study involving children, where they were asked to rate their reactions to several different supportive statements. According to that study, the kids varied widely in which statements they found most supportive.

Tanner expanded the new study to include college students and trained experts from a clinical training program. The results were largely similar and included several interesting findings.

For example:

A person’s response to a supportive statement generally has more to do with their own openness to receiving support and how they perceive the other person’s intent, rather than the actual words or phrases used.

In fact, Tanner said “clumsy statements” can often “do more harm than good.” So, simply showing up and expressing your sympathy is probably enough.

A discussion on Reddit drilled down on this point, as people often mistakenly think expressing empathy is important, when in reality, compassion is a far more effective tool. As one Redditor wrote:

People think commiserating on tragedy is the right response, but it is never as good as, "Wow, that sucks." What I mean is if someone tells you their mother has cancer no need to immediately share, "Oh, my mother also had cancer."

As the British Psychological Society noted, more research still needs to be done in real-world situations and across different cultures, but the new study is still a powerful insight into debunking some of the myths about how we can and should be our most supportive selves.

Heroes

If you're a woman and you want to be a CEO, you should probably think about changing your name to "Jeffrey" or "Michael." Or possibly even "Michael Jeffreys" or "Jeffrey Michaels."

According to Fortune, last year, more men named Jeffrey and Michael became CEOs of America's top companies than women. A whopping total of one woman became a CEO, while two men named Jeffrey took the title, and two men named Michael moved into the C-suite as well.

The "New CEO Report" for 2018, which looks at new CEOS for the 250 largest S&P 500 companies, found that 23 people were appointed to the position of CEO. Only one of those 23 people was a woman. Michelle Gass, the new CEO of Kohl's, was the lone female on the list.

Keep Reading Show less
popular

How much of what we do is influenced by what we see on TV? When it comes to risky behavior, Netflix isn't taking any chances.

After receiving a lot of heat, the streaming platform is finally removing a controversial scenedepicting teen suicide in season one of "13 Reasons Why. The decision comes two years after the show's release after statistics reveal an uptick in teen suicide.

"As we prepare to launch season three later this summer, we've been mindful about the ongoing debate around the show. So on the advice of medical experts, including Dr. Christine Moutier, Chief Medical Officer at the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, we've decided with creator Brian Yorkey and the producers to edit the scene in which Hannah takes her own life from season one," Netflix said in a statement, per The Hollywood Reporter.

Keep Reading Show less
Culture

At Trump's 'Social Media Summit' on Thursday, he bizarrely claimed Arnold Schwarzenegger had 'died' and he had witnessed said death. Wait, what?!


He didn't mean it literally - thank God. You can't be too sure! After all, he seemed to think that Frederick Douglass was still alive in February. More recently, he described a world in which the 1770s included airports. His laissez-faire approach to chronology is confusing, to say the least.

Keep Reading Show less
Democracy

Words matter. And they especially matter when we are talking about the safety and well-being of children.

While the #MeToo movement has shed light on sexual assault allegations that have long been swept under the rug, it has also brought to the forefront the language we use when discussing such cases. As a writer, I appreciate the importance of using varied wording, but it's vital we try to remain as accurate as possible in how we describe things.

There can be gray area in some topics, but some phrases being published by the media regarding sexual predation are not gray and need to be nixed completely—not only because they dilute the severity of the crime, but because they are simply inaccurate by definition.

One such phrase is "non-consensual sex with a minor." First of all, non-consensual sex is "rape" no matter who is involved. Second of all, most minors legally cannot consent to sex (the age of consent in the U.S. ranges by state from 16 to 18), so sex with a minor is almost always non-consensual by definition. Call it what it is—child rape or statutory rape, depending on circumstances—not "non-consensual sex."

Keep Reading Show less
Culture