This 1975 interview is a reminder that Helen Mirren has been fighting sexism for decades.

"I'd like you to explain what you mean by my 'equipment' in great detail."

In 1975, Dame Helen Mirren was asked — in all seriousness — if her "equipment" hindered her from being a serious actress.

The then-30-year-old Mirren had been chatting with British talk show host Michael Parkinson when the Q&A took an ... awkward turn.

"Do you find ... that this — what could be best described as your equipment — in fact, hinders you, perhaps?" Parkinson inquired.


GIF via "Parkinson."

Mirren — never one to misinterpret such a thoughtful, important question — asked that he get more specific.

"I'd like you to explain what you mean by my 'equipment' in great detail," she countered.

"Well, your physical attributes," Parkinson replied.

GIF via "Parkinson."

After Parkinson confirmed that, yes, he was referring to her body and breasts, Mirren patiently pointed out how absurd that notion really is.

"Because serious actresses can't have big bosoms, is that what you mean?" she asked. "I can't think that could necessarily be true. I mean, what a crummy performance if people are obsessed with the size of your bosom or anything else. I would hope that the performance and the [stage] play and the living relationship between all the people on stage and all the people in the audience would overcome such boring questions, really."

Last year, commenting on the sexist interview from decades ago, Mirren pointed out that the 1970s were "horrible" for women — even worse than the 1940s or 1950s, in a certain respect.

“That decade, after the sexual revolution but before feminism, was perilous for women,” Mirren said, according to The Guardian. “Men saw that as a sort of, 'Oh fantastic! We can f**k anything, however we like, whenever we like. They’re up for grabs, boys!”

The resurfaced video of Mirren's interview serves as a reminder that the actress has been fighting back against a sexist industry for decades.

And she certainly hasn't let off the gas pedal in recent years.

In an interview with "The Wrap" last year, Mirren didn't mince words when she noted how ridiculous it was that — true story — a 37-year-old actress was turned away from a role for being "too old" to play the wife of a 55-year-old man.

How did Mirren feel about that?

GIF via "The Wrap."

And in an interview with AOL Makers in July 2016, Mirren pointed out how the push for gender equality has created a new era of entitled women — and that's not at all a bad thing.

"Any woman now actually is a feminist — they don't realize it, because they're living in a world feminism has, to a certain extent, created for them. Which is very exciting, because it's entitled. That's what I love about them. They're entitled."

Photo by Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images.

It's ludicrous that Hollywood actresses still need to put up with this garbage — in casting, in interviews, and even on red carpets — but at least we have Mirren (and a growing list of women in her corner) to call B.S. on an industry that remains in dire need of change.

Watch Mirren tackle that interview from 1975 like a boss:

Most Shared

Some people apparently don't understand just how unbelievably good Serena Williams is on the tennis court.

Why they don't understand this is unclear. She holds more open era Grand Slam titles than any other tennis player, male or female. She's set Olympic records, ranking records, age records, prize money earnings records—the woman is a record-breaking machine. (Fun fact: Williams is the highest paid female athlete of all time, having earned $86 million in prize money during her career. The next highest is Maria Sharipova, with $38 million in prize money. If that's not total dominance, I don't know what is.)

Her list of tennis championships is a mile long. You don't even have to follow tennis to know that Serena Williams is a freaking powerhouse of a tennis player, not to mention one of the greatest athletes of all time.

And yet, there are dudes who believe they could take her on.

Keep Reading Show less
Culture
Alie Ward

Your dinner plate shouldn't shame you for eating off of it. But that's exactly what a set being sold at Macy's did.

The retailer has since removed the dinnerware from their concept shop, Story, after facing social media backlash for the "toxic message" they were sending.

The plates, made by Pourtions, have circles on them to indicate what a proper portion should look like, along with "helpful — and hilarious — visual cues" to keep people from "overindulging."

There are serval different styles, with one version labeling the largest portion as "mom jeans," the medium portion as "favorite jeans," and the smallest portion as "skinny jeans."

Keep Reading Show less
Well Being

The 2013 documentary "Blackfish" shined a light on the cruelty that orcas face in captivity and created a sea change in the public's perception of SeaWorld and other marine life parks.

This "Blackfish" backlash nearly deep-sixed SeaWorld and led Canada to pass a law that bans oceanariums from breeding whales and dolphins or holding them in captivity. Animals currently being held in Canada's marine parks are allowed to remain as well as those taken in for rehabilitation.

Podcaster and MMA announcer Joe Rogan saluted Canada's decision on a recent episode.

"First of all, what assholes are we that we have those goddman things in captivity? A big fucking shout out to Canada because Canada, mostly probably through the noise that my friend Phil Demers has created in trying to get MarineLand shut down, Canada has banned all dolphin and all whale captivity. It's amazing. I hope the United States does it well, I hope it goes worldwide," Rogan told his guest, economist and mathematician Eric Weinstein.

Keep Reading Show less
Planet
Youtube

Should a man lose his home because the grass in his yard grew higher than 10 inches? The city of Dunedin, Florida seems to think so.

According to the Institute of Justice, which is representing Jim Ficken, he had a very good reason for not mowing his lawn – and tried to rectify the situation as best he could.

In 2014, Jim's mom became ill and he visited her often in South Carolina to help her out. When he was away, his grass grew too long and he was cited by a code office; he cut the grass and wasn't fined.

France has started forcing supermarkets to donate food instead of throwing it away.

But several years later, this one infraction would come back to haunt him after he left to take care of him's mom's affairs after she died. The arrangements he made to have his grass cut fell through (his friend who he asked to help him out passed away unexpectedly) and that set off a chain reaction that may result in him losing his home.

The 69-year-old retiree now faces a $29,833.50 fine plus interest. Watch the video to find out just what Jim is having to deal with.

Mow Your Lawn or Lose Your House! www.youtube.com

Cities