Black Women’s Health Imperative CEO Linda Goler Blount on health equity and reproductive justice

You may never have heard of President and CEO of the Black Women’s Health Imperative (BWHI) Linda Goler Blount, but for over 25 years, she’s been doing the arduous and yet vital work of assuring that Black women achieve health equity and reproductive justice. Sometimes working behind the scenes securing funding, and other times in…

Array
ArrayPhoto credit: Array

You may never have heard of President and CEO of the Black Women’s Health Imperative (BWHI) Linda Goler Blount, but for over 25 years, she’s been doing the arduous and yet vital work of assuring that Black women achieve health equity and reproductive justice.

Sometimes working behind the scenes securing funding, and other times in front of the cameras or on Capitol Hill fighting what can feel like a Sisyphean feat to move her organization forward in its mission. Blount is resolute in her battle against two of the greatest risk factors to the health of Black women are racism and gender discrimination.

UP: What are some of the biggest challenges facing Black women today — vaccine hesitancy, preventative health, maternal mortality, diet, stress… etc?

LB: Stress is the number one health issue for Black women. Obesity-related syndromes such as hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease have their roots in stress — and microaggressions trigger stress. We know there’s a causal relationship between stress and weight. Black women have about 15% more cortisol in their bloodstream than white women. It changes their metabolism. If you give Black women and white women the same low-fat diet, Black women will lose weight more slowly and if both groups eat a high-fat diet, Black women will gain weight more quickly. We can see this in the DNA level. So, we focus our programs on asking women how they feel about being a Black woman in this environment at this moment. Because if we don’t understand that and more importantly, if providers, policymakers, and corporate leaders don’t understand that, then we’re not going to make the kind of progress we need to improve health outcomes for Black women. And equity is a long way off.


UP: Talk about the connection between racism and the health of Black women.

LB: In 1992, Arline Geronimus published an article on “weathering” where she discussed that Black women are literally aging faster than white women. Between two women, one Black and one White, both age 65, although they may look the same, Black women can be five to seven years older biologically because of the effect of racism and gender oppression. Fleda Mask Jackson found a causal relationship between experiences of racial and gender discrimination and low birth weight and premature deliveries and maternal deaths. We understand the biological response and what that does to the body, but not the psychological impacts. And I’m really interested in the everyday experiences of Black women and what that does [to the body]. When you have to have that talk with your 16-year-old son about driving and when the police stop him. When you see people not getting promoted or things said at work that are just out and out racist. When you go to a store and you’re followed around because you’re Black and they assume you’re going to steal something. We don’t have a full understanding of what that does to us.

UP: What are some of the changes in the health of Black women from when the organization started versus today?

LB: Our roots are in self-care. BWHI started 38 years ago with groups and sister-circles talking about health. Then over time with reproductive health, in particular, the organization needed to deal with policy and structural barriers that prevented us from practice to self-care. The changes have been on evidence-based strategies and calling it out when Black women are not included when drugs, therapeutics, and devices developed without the involvement of Black women as both as participants and as researchers.

More recently, we began working to change the narrative around how we talk about data, gender, and race, and how we tell the story. If we don’t start changing the way we use language, then we’re never going to understand Black women’s health. People will say, ‘Black women die 42% more from breast cancer than white women.’ But, that doesn’t tell the whole story and what a reader is left believing is that this data is the way it is because these women are Black or Latina. It’s not biological or genetic, it’s the lived experience.

UP: What can Black women do today to change their health outcomes?

LB: We talk a lot about meditation or prayer, and breathing. Breathing is critical. The 5-7-9, where you breathe in for 5 seconds, hold for 7 seconds and breathe out for 9 seconds. This can literally reduce cortisol in your bloodstream. We’ve got to take time for ourselves. Be intentional about separating yourself from stuff that isn’t good for you. For me and my team, we try to make it a point to take breaks. This work can be overwhelming. When you’re talking about dealing with hundreds of years of oppression and people who want to keep things exactly as they’ve always been, but who say things that are very different. I try to keep perspective. But it’s hard because there’s exactly one organization to do this work and if we weren’t here to do it, I don’t know what would happen.

UP: Can you give a couple of anecdotes where the health outcome of a Black woman was impacted by one of the BWHI programs?

LB: I would say around screening and mammography. In 2015, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) had this brilliant idea to raise the age of mammography for women from 40 to 50 years old. So, in 2016 we worked with several members of Congress on the PALS Act aka Protecting Access to Lifesaving Screening to get a moratorium on recommendations for women to begin screenings at 40 years old. Because if this became policy then insurers would stop paying for mammograms under 50. I attended at least 30 meetings, testified in front of Congress, I met with HHS, and other than the one Black person who’s on the USPSTF, I was the only Black person in the room. It was disheartening, but not surprising. But, these recommendations are based on science. So, here I am face-to-face with my former colleagues at the American Cancer Society who want to raise the age. So, I told them, ‘I know the data.’ These studies were done in Sweden and Canada and there’s not a Black woman in them. Black women get breast cancer 5 to 10 years younger than white women. This highlighted a Black woman’s organization and science and that we know the data just as well as you. While you may interpret it one way, let’s look at the complete story. You’re talking about applying a body of evidence to a group of people who had nothing to do with its creation in the first place.

UP: Do you feel a sense of pressure because, at this moment, the door of interest is open concerning the health and wellness of Black Americans?

LB: It’s an exponentially greater level of stress. We talk all the time about having this open window and being afraid it’s going to slam shut. Like, white people are going to be over this. ‘Okay, you’ve had your moment. We invested millions of dollars and you all need to be happy. So, let’s get back to the way things were. Just shut up and dribble.’ But, while feeling that pressure, there’s not a whole lot that can be done in the six months, nine months or even in a year, so we have to keep the conversation going. Right now, we’re creating a corporate index so that people can look at corporations and say, ‘Well, here’s your statement from last year. Now, what are you really doing?’ If we don’t keep pressure on these folks they get to ignore and pretend they never said what they said.

UP: Are there celebrities or well-known figures you would love to partner with BWHI? Any specific initiatives?

LB: Having Serena [Williams] talk about maternal health would be amazing. We need women across the lifespan. We need Oprah and Alfre Woodard. All these women for whom health is critical and understand the significance of the health of Black women. If we are successful, I think we also need to get Black men involved in this work.

UP: What can people who’re reading this do to move the needle forward on the health of Black women in their lives and/or communities?

LB: They can learn about BWHI and the issues as they really are not what they read, but understand the context in which Black women live and what that means for their health. So, they don’t fall into the trap of blaming the obese Black woman or blaming the woman with hypertension and being mindful of the language they use when they’re talking about race, gender, and health. It takes understanding to get to a level of compassion. And for those who have resources, they can contribute.

UP: Who are some of the women you look to for inspiration?

LB: I’d say Civil Rights activist Gloria Richardson. She’s always been the symbol of what can be done by a Black woman. I want to be the Gloria Richardson of epidemiology and I can say to these scientists, ‘Talk to the hand,’ in the same way she did holding off a national guardsman with a bayonet in his hand and [a fierce side eye].

  • She was fired for taking 10 minutes to reply to emails. Then she made sure they’d regret it.
    A frustrated employee is typing on her computerPhoto credit: Canva

    She had been on the job for four months when she was pulled without warning into a meeting with her manager, HR, and legal. Effective immediately, she was fired. The reason given: she took ten minutes to respond to emails.

    “That was a bullsh*t reason,” she wrote in a post to Reddit’s r/MaliciousCompliance that has since racked up more than 19,000 upvotes. “To be honest, I was furious.”

    The job itself had never been easy. She’d been hired as a speaker coordinator for a company that planned large conferences, and from the start, as she described it to Bored Panda, there was no onboarding, no training, and no clear point of contact. “I was simply given the log-in info for a couple of different websites and told to get to work.” She was the only person in the role. All the institutional knowledge about speakers, schedules, and upcoming events lived entirely with her.

    Audience listening to a speaker at a conference. Photo credit: Canva

    Her manager spoke limited English, which made communication difficult in ways that weren’t anyone’s fault but created real problems. When she once asked her manager for a call to clarify something, the response came back: “No cranne. Self skills is a must. I am bird without head.” It took her several days to piece together that her manager was trying to say she was overwhelmed and needed her employee to be more self-sufficient.

    She adapted, figured things out, and by her own account, kept the speakers happy. Then came the meeting, the firing, and the reason that didn’t add up. Ten minutes to reply to an email. No written warning. No verbal warning. Nothing.

    During the exit interview, HR asked her to hand over her files and walk them through where things stood with an upcoming event scheduled in 17 days. She reached into her bag and pulled out her copy of the NDA she’d signed when she started.

    As she told it on Reddit, she pointed to a specific clause: as a former employer, they were now prohibited from receiving confidential information about the position under the terms of the very agreement they’d had her sign. “As per my NDA, I am not to discuss intimate details or share documents relating to this position with any employer, past or future. Since this firing was effective immediately, you are now a former employer and I am bound by my NDA.”

    A non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Photo credit: Canva

    HR pushed back. She held firm. Legal was brought in. Legal read the clause and confirmed she was correct.

    The event, by her account, was a disaster. More than half the speakers pulled out once communication broke down. Her former manager nearly lost her job over it. The employee, for her part, closed her Reddit post with the mocking subject line that had gotten her fired in the first place: “All because I ~tAKe ToO lONg tO ResPoND tO EMaILS~”

    The story resonated because it captures something many workers recognize: the particular frustration of being let go without cause, without warning, and without recourse, and the rare satisfaction of finding that the company had, in this case, handed her exactly the recourse she needed. Save your contracts. Read the fine print. Sometimes the NDA works both ways.

    This article originally appeared earlier this year.

  • They evicted her after 40 years to claim her hand-painted murals. Her parting gift was perfect.
    A woman paints a mural indoors Photo credit: Canva
    ,

    They evicted her after 40 years to claim her hand-painted murals. Her parting gift was perfect.

    The landlord’s family evicted her to claim her artwork, but a neighbor with a paint sprayer had a different idea.

    For nearly four decades, a retired art teacher had been turning her rental house into something extraordinary. Every wall inside held hand-painted murals, Disney movies and fairy tales rendered floor to ceiling, the kind of place that people in the neighborhood knew by reputation. Outside, she’d added a cottage facade. Inside, it was unlike anything else on the street.

    She had no lease. The original landlord had given her a verbal agreement that the art on the walls wouldn’t be a problem, and she’d been there since the mid-1980s with an informal understanding that the house might one day be hers.

    Then the original landlord died. His son inherited the property, came to inspect it with his daughter, and they fell in love with what they saw. According to a post shared to Reddit’s r/pettyrevenge by a neighbor, u/ZZZ-Top, the family decided the art house should go to the daughter. Without a lease, the tenant had limited options. The murals she’d painted, the very thing that made the property desirable, were used as justification to push her out.

    “She was devastated,” the neighbor wrote.

    But she landed on her feet. Friends helped her find a property in another state at the last minute, one with a full art studio on the ground floor. The question of what to leave behind was where things got interesting.

    She had originally planned to leave the murals intact. Then her neighbor, a friend who had been wanting to practice using a powered paint sprayer, made her an offer: he would restore the house to what he called “Rebecca standards” for free. As he explained in the post, “Rebecca standards” is neighborhood shorthand for the look of a flipped house: everything painted in the same flat white and depressing grey, every surface generic, every trace of personality gone. The landlord’s family had evicted her specifically to get the murals. Rebecca standards would make that impossible.

    A woman paints a mural on a wall. Photo credit: Canva

    She agreed.

    Her furniture went into storage. Her neighbor let her stay in his guest house in exchange for one new mural on his living room wall. Then the work began. As the Someecards account of the story details, the painter friend sanded every wall in the house until the murals became nothing but blotchy color ghosts. Then came the Kilz primer, sprayed wall to wall. Then the grey. Wood paneling, trim, switch covers, outlet covers, counters, cabinets. All of it the same flat, lifeless shade. “The house looked dead inside when I went in to check it out,” the neighbor wrote. “It was weird not seeing all the murals.”

    Outside, a landscaping friend cleared the cottage facade and the plants, replacing everything with gravel, sand, and a single boulder.

    A few days after she left, the neighbor noticed the house was still empty. He asked around. Some U-Haul trucks had shown up earlier in the week, he was told, but none of them had been unloaded. Nobody had moved in.

    The post drew over 38,000 upvotes and hundreds of comments from people who understood exactly what had happened. “They could have easily asked her for a commission to do the same murals in their own home,” one commenter wrote, “but chose to kick her out instead.” Another kept it simpler: “Kick me out? My art goes with me. Enjoy the blank walls.”

    For anyone renting without a written lease, the story carries a quieter lesson. Verbal agreements offer almost no protection when ownership changes hands. The woman lost her home of 40 years because of a handshake arrangement with someone who was no longer alive to honor it. She found a better situation in the end, one with a proper studio and walls she actually owns. But the path there didn’t have to be that hard.

    This article originally appeared earlier this year.

  • A Wisconsin senior painted 44 portraits of classmates she’d drifted from. Their reactions when they received them say everything.
    A young woman smiles at a portraitPhoto credit: Canva
    ,

    A Wisconsin senior painted 44 portraits of classmates she’d drifted from. Their reactions when they received them say everything.

    Before graduation, she quietly painted a portrait of every classmate she’d ever known and given them away.

    Molly Schafer had a secret she’d been keeping all year.

    Every day at Waunakee High School in Wisconsin, she’d walk past classmates in the halls, people she’d known since elementary school, and they had no idea what she was doing in the corner of the school library after the final bell, or in the studio she’d set up at home. She was painting their portraits. All of them.

    “It was almost kind of like evil shenanigans that were going on,” she told the NW Indiana Times. “You have no idea what I’m doing. You have no clue what I’m making.”

    basketball, gym, sports
    A high school basketball game. Photo credit: Canva

    Schafer had been outgoing in elementary and middle school, but social anxiety reshaped her high school years. She drifted from her peers, found a circle of older students, and watched that circle graduate and leave while she stayed behind. “I’ve never really known anyone in my senior class,” she told hngnews.com. “And I’ve just been so alone.” One moment captured the feeling precisely: she was photographing a basketball game for Warrior Media, the school’s sports streaming channel, when she slipped and fell. Every student in the gym turned to look. Nobody asked if she was okay.

    But the photography gave her something she hadn’t expected. A catalog. Thousands of shots of her classmates mid-game, mid-leap, mid-effort, faces alive with concentration and competition. When it came time for her AP Art final, she knew what she wanted to do with them.

    Starting in the fall of 2024, she began painting. She’d work at school, then go home and paint for another four or five hours in the studio she’d built in her garage. She originally planned 50 portraits, reduced it to 45, and finished with 44, each one based on her own sports photography, each one a classmate she’d known once and wanted to know again. By graduation, she’d spent approximately 600 hours across all of them, as reported by CBS News in a Steve Hartman “On the Road” segment that aired in June 2025.

    The paintings were portraits in the truest sense. Not posed, not generic, but specific people caught in specific moments, rendered with the kind of attention that takes months to accumulate. Each one was a gift.

    “I wanted to be seen,” she told Fox47. “I wanted to reconnect with these people who I haven’t talked to in years, and I wanted to show them that even though they’ve been such a small part of my life, they’ve stuck with me.”

    The reactions, when she handed them out, ranged from stunned to emotional. “It’s one of the coolest things I’ve ever seen someone do, especially for someone you aren’t that close with,” one classmate told CBS News. Another admitted: “We did have that friendship, and I didn’t put forth the work to keep it.” A third said: “All of us probably feel a little regret for not paying more attention.” Senior Brady Barman, one of the recipients, said that it simply felt good “to feel appreciated by someone else.”

    Schafer’s art teacher, Beth Crook De Valdez, watched the whole project unfold. “Watching her go through that process and seeing her internal reflection about this project she came up with really fills your heart,” she said.

    After the CBS segment aired, commission requests started arriving. More than 100 of them from people who had seen what she could do and wanted her to do it for them.

    Schafer’s own takeaway was characteristically direct. “You can’t go through life thinking that you don’t have friends because they don’t like you, because that’s not the case,” she said. “People aren’t thinking that hard about you. It’s all in your head. You just have to try.”

    She spent 600 hours proving it.

    This article originally appeared earlier this year.

  • Video of two brothers Irish step dancing to Beyoncé’s country hit ‘Texas Hold ‘Em’ is pure delight
    The Gardiner Brothers stepping in time to Beyoncé's "Texas Hold 'Em."Photo credit: Gardiner Brothers/TikTok (with permission)

    In early February 2024, Beyoncé rocked the music world by releasing a surprise new album of country tunes. The album, Renaissance: Act II, includes a song called “Texas Hold ‘Em,” which shot up the country charts—with a few bumps along the way—and landed Queen Bey at the No.1 spot.

    As the first Black female artist to have a song hit No. 1 on Billboard’s country music charts, Beyoncé once again proved her popularity, versatility, and ability to break barriers without missing a beat. In one fell swoop, she got people who had zero interest in country music to give it a second look, forced country music fans to broaden their own ideas about what country music looks like, prompted conversations about bending and blending musical genres and styles, and gave the Internet a crash course on the Black roots of country music.

    And she inspired the Gardiner Brothers to add yet another element to the mix—Irish step dance.

    In a TikTok that’s been viewed over 42 million times, the Gardiner Brothers don cowboy hats while they step in time to “Texas Hold ‘Em,” much to the delight of viewers everywhere.

    Watch:

    Michael and Matthew Gardiner are professional Irish-American step dancers and choreographers who have gained international fame with their award-winning performances. They’ve also built a following of millions on social media with videos like this one, where they dance to popular songs, usually in an outdoor environment.

    The melding of Irish dance with country music sung by a Black American female artist may seem unlikely, but it could be viewed merely as country music coming back to its roots. As mentioned, country music has roots in Black culture and tradition. One major staple of the country music genre, the banjo, was created by enslaved Africans and their descendants during the colonial era, according to The Smithsonian. The genre also has deep roots in the ballad tradition of the Irish, English and Scottish settlers in the Appalachian region of the U.S. Despite modern country music’s struggle to break free from “music for white people” stereotypes, it’s much more diverse than many realize or care to admit, and Queen Bey is simply following tradition.

    banjo, country music, country, roots, genre
    Man playing banjo. Canva Photos

    People are loving the blending of genres and culture that the TikTok exemplifies.

    “Never thought I’d see Irish step dancing while Beyoncé sings country,” wrote on commenter. “My life is complete. ♥️”

    “So happy Beyoncé dropped this song and exposed my timeline to diversified talent ,” wrote another.

    “Beyoncé brought the world together with this song ,” offered another person.

    “Ayeeee Irish Dancing has entered the BeyHive chatroom… WELCOME!! ” exclaimed another.

    “I don’t think I can explain how many of my interests are intersecting here,” wrote one commenter, reflecting what several others shared as well.

    The Beyoncé/Gardiner Brothers combo and the reactions to it are a good reminder that none of us fit into one box of interest or identity. We’re all an eclectic mix of tastes and styles, so we can almost always find a way to connect with others over something we enjoy. What better way to be reminded of that fact than through an unexpected mashup that blends the magic of music with the delight of dance? Truly, the arts are a powerful uniting force we should utilize more often.

    And for an extra bit of fun, the Gardiner Brothers also shared their bloopers from filming the video. Turns out stepping in the rain isn’t as easy as they make it look.

     

    This article originally appeared last year. It has been updated.

  • 17 Gen X candies kids of the ’80s are still pining for
    Gen X misses the candy they grew up with in the 1980s.Photo credit: Reddit/Longjumping-Shoe7805/welding_guy_from_LI/ajslinger

    Gen X (people born between 1965 and 1980) grew up eating some pretty incredible foods. From classic casseroles and meatloaf to old-school sandwich combos, food in the ’80s was filled with delicious staples.

    Gen X also had a major sweet tooth. In the ’80s, they were munching on unique candy from drugstores and corner shops. Many Gen Xers argue that candy in the ’80s was the best, including comedian Karen Morgan—whose bit about ’80s candy being “mean to children” resonated with Gen Xers on Reddit.

    “We had candy like Atomic Fireballs. You couldn’t eat that! It was who could leave it in your mouth the longest before you spit it out,” she quips.

    More Gen Xers shared their favorite candies from the ’80s that they miss most. Although some are still around, most don’t taste the same—and many have been discontinued.

    From sour varieties and chewy classics to chocolate bars and pure sugar treats, these are some of the best nostalgic candies Gen X hasn’t forgotten.

    Willy Wonka’s DinaSour Eggs

    “Soo many great memories seeing this box! I wish they would bring them back!!” — blue_eyed_girlie

    “I liked getting to the sour center.” — robgrab

    “Duuude remember these and loved them! There was an urban legend in my neighborhood that there was some of these that had a candy shaped dinasour inside…. Never got one! ( never made it to the cherry tree in pitfall either!) lol.” — right_bank_cafe

    Mr. Bones

    “I loved that candy!! I had so many coffins all over my room!” — FlawedWoman

    “OMG I completely forgot about this candy! We ate it to quick to make a skeleton 😂😂.” — PaleontologistSad316

    Fun Dip

    “My little brother always liked the powder better so if we both got a pack of fun dip I’d give him the powder and he’d give me the candy stick. 😆” — Happy_Leg-2063

    “The Lik-a-Stix from the Fun Dip. I just threw the powder away.” — non3ck

    “I wish they still had the lime.” — bubblehead772

    Johnny Apple Treats

    “Johnny Appletreats were my favorite😋” — Longjumping-Shoe7805

    “I’ve been looking everywhere for apple treats. They are like f*cking CRACK.” — truthteller5

    Alexander The Grape

    “Alexander!!!!!!! So good.” — cwvandalfan

    “I ate all of these but probably Alexander The Grape most of all.” — Grand_Snow_2637

    Cherry Clan

    “I really loved the cherry clan!!!!” — McKitNassty

    “Cherry Clan were the best. 🍒” — Krystalmyth

    Marathon

    “This is THE answer. I sure miss them.” — Beanholiostyle

    “I both loved these and forgot about them. Now I have a craving for one.” —Ok_Experience_8194

    “Marathon Bar (stealer of fillings).” — JCo1968

    Tangy Taffy

    “Best part was freezing them, then you could bang them on a table and they would shatter then you had little pieces of them to eat.” — Chewcudda42

    “Tangy Taffy. So much better than Laffy Taffy IMO.” — User Unknown

    Reggie!

    “Ooh, those were so good…like an oversized chocolate turtle, but more savory.” — throw123454321purple

    “They were awesome. Pretty much was just a round Baby Ruth but sooooo good.” — jmf0828

    @hellosweetscandy

    Replying to @Delia’s Nail Studio LLC Lets take a look at some candy that was popular in the 1980s! #hellosweetscandy #candyshop #candystore #candy #nostalgia #nostalgic #retro #1980s #wny #smallbusiness

    ♬ 80’s nostalgic synth pop(1140622) – Studio Bach

    Willy Wonka’s Oompas

    “Oompa’s by Willy Wonka. Ginormous half chocolate half peanut butter M&M’s…….” — Ledophile

    “Peanut Butter Oompas… they were similar to peanut butter M&Ms, but tasted better.” — Interesting-Night740

    BarNone

    “Bar None. Like a cross between a Twix and KitKat.” — Katriina_B

    Milk Shake

    “There used to be a candy bar called Milkshake. They at I remember it would have been slightly between an Uno Bar and a Three Musketeers. It has a taste of a chocolate malted milkshake. They were delicious but did not last long that I remember.” — Salt_Ingenuity_720

    PB Max

    “I swear when I talk to my kids about the PB max, I feel like one of those old cartoons where you’re saying ‘back in my day’ 😂 by far the best peanut butter candy bar ever.” — New-Car-3759

    “These are discontinued but they were so good! Well my young mind used to think they were good lol.” — Pink_Pixie00

    Atomic FireBall

    “Atomic Fireballs, I used to love those things!” — AzureGriffon

    “When I quit smoking, I used these to get through it. Then I had an Atomic Fireball addiction. Thankfully, that was a much easier habit to break.” — ThresherGDI

    Whatchamacallit

    “Whatchamacallits are my favorite candy bar, hands down. They are definitely different size wise and also the taste, but they are still pretty good. Rarely do things stay the same, but it’s especially bad when it’s your favorite candy.” — yellow_forsythia

    “When Whatchamacallit first came out, it was a bar of crispy rice covered in chocolate. I LOVED it. Then they decided to ‘improve’ it by adding caramel. I didn’t like it as much anymore, but still bought it because it was still a good candy bar.” — Alman54

    “🎶Whatchoo say? Whatchamacallit! 🎶 Can still remember the song from the commercial.” — demonOS_

    Skor

    “I had a Skor bar the other day and it just hit SO right.” — Luvsseattle

    “Skor. I remember when those things came out that they positioned them as upscale candy bars. My great-grandmother loved them because they made her feel fancy.” — jimb575

    Oh Henry!

    “This was one of my favs in 5th grade going to the candy store after school.” — banana_fana_1234

    “Oh, made my mouth water I miss those😧.” — Wuddlecat

  • Romeo is ‘cringe’: English teacher shares what Gen Z thinks about ‘Romeo & Juliet’
    A high school teacher shares the unhinged things her students have said about 'Romeo & Juliet.'Photo credit: @miss.dugan1/Instagram

    Shakespeare is a staple of any high school English curriculum. Yet, getting young folks to actually understand, let alone appreciate, the Good Bard’s work has always been a bit of a challenge. Unless you’re teaching it to a room full of theatre kids, that is.

    Recently, a high school teacher named Molly Dugan shared some of her current students’ reactions to one of Shakespeare’s most notable works, Romeo & Juliet. Spoiler alert: they weren’t fans. Nonetheless, their remarks were comedy gold.

    High schoolers react to Romeo & Juliet

    Some of the comments reflected the same counterpoints many younger generations have had about well-received works of yesteryear (looking at you, ’90s rom-coms).

    For instance, one student said, “Romeo is hella cringe, get him off my screen.”

    Meanwhile, two other students accused him of being a “hella stalker” with “bad rizz” who just “wants the huzz,” a.k.a. a girl, a woman, or, to really make it feel dated, a “boo.”

    Folks in the comments didn’t really disagree with these points. 

    “‘Bro’s a hella stalker’ oddly accurate take😂,” one viewer wrote. 

    Another echoed, “Bro actually was a hella stalker and arguably was hella cringe.”

    Another teacher even shared, “Directed it last year. Best response: ‘where are their parents?!’”

    Distinct brand of savage high school sarcasm on full display

    “Oh, so you actually hate us,” one student said, apparently after Dugan asked the class to get their notebooks out.

    Another delivered a rather low blow, saying, “We don’t need subtitles. We’re not old.”

    But then some genuinely baffling questions left many wondering if this generation is, in fact, “cooked”:

    “Was there time back then? Like, did it exist when Romeo and Juliet were alive?”

    “Is Shakespeare a real person? Because I thought he was one of those Greek gods. So I’ve been confused.” 

    Woof. That’s…something.

    Apparently, a few other teachers have had very similar experiences

    “One year I got ‘What’s Shakespeare’s last name?’” one commented. 

    Another shared, “At the beginning of teaching the Anne Frank unit, I asked my 8th graders what they knew about her…’Isn’t she a rap star?’ 😳”

    Who knows—perhaps the kiddos would have appreciated this Gen Z–ified version of Romeo & Juliet

    Shakespeare’s work has always been a bit of a hurdle for students

    His plays were written more than 400 years ago, after all, and can sometimes feel as though they’re in an entirely different language. On top of that, Shakespeare wrote in verse, using rhythm and poetic devices that were meant to be heard onstage rather than quietly analyzed in a classroom. When those lines are lifted from the stage and dropped into a worksheet or textbook, it can take a lot more effort for students to connect with what’s actually happening in the story.

    Cultural references can also add another layer of confusion. Jokes, social norms, and expectations around love, family, and marriage were very different in Elizabethan England than they are today. Without that context, characters’ actions can seem strange, exaggerated, or downright problematic to modern readers.

    That’s part of what makes teaching Shakespeare such a unique challenge. Teachers often have to act as translators, guiding students through unfamiliar vocabulary and historical context while also trying to reveal the very human stories beneath it all.

    Once you get past the old-fashioned phrasing, the themes are surprisingly relatable

    Romeo & Juliet is about power dynamics, rivalry, and impulsive decisions that spiral out of control (and love, I guess). Those ideas are still easy to recognize, even if the characters express them in dramatically poetic language. It’s what gives Shakespeare such staying power and explains why he continues to show up in classrooms century after century, much to the bemoaning of high schoolers.

  • A new hopeful payphone project invites ‘Boomers’ and ‘Zoomers’ to connect one conversation at a time
    A social experiment connects Boomers and Zoomers through payphones.Photo credit: Matter Neuroscience/Instagram

    Imagine you’re young and strolling through a university campus, wishing you could randomly chat with someone much older. Perhaps you’re looking for a bit of wisdom. Or maybe you simply wish to talk to a Baby Boomer, like a parent or grandparent. If you’re on the Boston University campus near Pavement Coffeehouse, this wish could become a reality.

    The folks at Matter Neuroscience have created another social experiment in which they set up what look like payphones in two locations. One, outside a building on the BU campus, says “Call a Boomer.” The other is in the game room of a senior housing complex in Reno, Nevada. That one has a sign suggesting someone “Call a Zoomer.” The hope? That two generations can connect, have a lovely conversation, and spark a little dopamine in their day.

    Loneliness matters

    On the Matter Neuroscience Instagram page, they share the statistic that younger and older adults often suffer from loneliness: “Younger adults and older adults tend to experience the highest levels of loneliness of any age group, so the goal of this project is to inspire generational connection through meaningful conversations, despite differences in age, lifestyle, or politics.”

    They report that statistically, “over a third of people over 65 report being lonely. And over half of the students in college report being lonely.” They go on to note that loneliness can be more detrimental to one’s health than lack of exercise or even smoking cigarettes.

    Loneliness demographics in America. Photo credit: Matter Neuroscience

    A new idea

    Upworthy spoke with Calla Kessler, a social strategist at Matter Neuroscience, who explained the process:

    “The boomer/zoomer payphones are the second iteration of our Party Line experiment, which originally included in San Francisco and Abilene, Texas, encouraging Democrats and Republicans to find common ground and walk away with a positive interaction.”

    Kessler is referring to a project that Upworthy covered a little over a month ago. In that project, the team set up two makeshift “payphones” in Texas and California. The idea was for people on the left and right sides of the political aisle to connect without all the extraneous noise.

    Ben Goldhirsh, one of the co-founders of Matter Neuroscience (alongside neuroscientist Axel Bouchon), reported that after reviewing hours of footage, people were looking to connect on a human level 100% of the time. No arguments—just two people laughing while sharing a brief moment of their lives with a total stranger.

    Kessler said the success of the project inspired them to think about other demographics that would benefit from connection:

    “We landed on two groups that research shows experience some of the highest levels of loneliness: younger adults and older adults. The purpose of these projects is to share the science of happiness and help people live emotionally and molecularly balanced lives.”

    She reiterated how dangerous chronic loneliness can be:

    “Loneliness has been linked to health risks comparable to smoking, excessive drinking, and lack of exercise. Positive social interactions can influence our biology in the opposite direction, lowering cortisol while increasing feel-good neurotransmitters like dopamine, cannabinoids, and oxytocin.”

    How it works

    For those wondering how the payphones work, they were bought on Facebook Marketplace. They were then deconstructed so modems with SIM cards could be placed inside, making it possible to make toll-free calls.

    While they’re waiting for the results (the phones were just recently installed), people in the comment section were already excited. At the mere mention of the idea, thousands chimed in to add their two cents. One wrote, “This is so great! Can we make pen pals cool again?”

    Another noted that although they don’t fall into either generation, they’d love to take part as well: “I’m not old. I’m not young. But if that phone were in my vicinity, I would be calling someone every day.”

  • In 1893, a popular magazine predicted how fashion would change over the next 100 years. It is wild.
    Imagined outfits of the 1980s by a man in 1893.Photo credit: Public Domain

    If we look back over the last 100 years of fashion, we can see how much has changed. The 1920s were famous for loose, square-cut flapper dresses and pinstripe suits with wide-legged trousers. The ’50s saw fitted shirts, poodle skirts, and the “greaser” in his jeans, T-shirt, and leather jacket. The ’70s brought us bell-bottoms. The ’80s lit up with neon, and the ’90s grunge craze had us all in flannels.

    Just hold those images in your mind real quick as we make our way back to the 1890s. Victorian-era fashion was marked by corsets, bell-shaped skirts, and three-piece suits. Against that backdrop, in 1893, The Strand Magazine published predictions of what people would wear in the coming century. And, well, you just have to see it.

    The magazine feature by W. Cade Gall was called “Future Dictates of Fashion.” Gall framed his piece as a fictional story about an old man mysteriously finding a book published in 1993 called The Past Dictates of Fashion.

    Fashion, according to the made-up 1993 author of the made-up book, was governed by “immutable laws.” But according to Gall, those laws were unknown in 1893, when people thought of fashion as “a whim.” By the 1940s, however, fashion would assume “the dignity of a science.” It would even be taught in universities from the 1950s onward.

    Whatever those immutable laws of fashion were supposed to be, they must have been wild to explain the hilariously wrong predictions of what people would wear in the 20th century.

    You still have those 1920s fashion images in your head, right? Compare them to these drawings:

    Sketches of imaginary outfits from 1922, 1926, and 1929
    The 1920s predictions were a far cry from the roaring ’20s. Photo credit: Public domain

    To add to the hilarity, here’s the commentary on the skirt length in the first drawing:

    “The skirt, it is true, is short enough to alarm prim contemporary dames, and it is scarcely less assuring to find in the whole of the remaining plates only three periods when it seems to have got longer.”

    Imagine if they’d seen the knee-length flapper dresses of the actual 1920s, followed by the miniskirts of the ’60s. The sheer horror.

    The style sketches for each decade provide laugh after laugh. What in the Shakespearean Strawberry Shortcake–Bo Peep is happening here in the 1930s?

    Sketches of imaginary outfits from the 1930s
    There’s a lot going on here, and none of it looks like the actual 1930s. Photo credit: Public domain

    The 1950s weren’t much better. Apparently, there was a trend toward a court-jester look in the mid-’50s?

    Sketches of imaginary outfits from the 1950s
    The 1950s: Puritan clowns or Shakespearean court jesters? Photo credit: Public domain

    The ’70s got a couple of things closer-ish to reality, kind of. Those collars could hint at butterfly collars, perhaps? And that 1978 outfit almost looks like bell-bottoms. Can we imagine people showing up to the disco in these digs?

    Sketches of imaginary outfits from the 1970s
    At least the 1970s had bell-bottoms, sort of. Photo credit: Public domain

    How about the ’80s? Do we see acid-washed jeans? Parachute pants? A preppy sweater tied around the shoulders, perhaps? Mmm, not exactly. More like The Wizard of Oz meets Alice in Wonderland.

    Sketches of imaginary outfits from the 1980s
    Imagined outfits of the 1980s by a man in 1893.Photo credit: Public Domain

    If you look at what models wear on haute couture runways, you might see clothing that aligns somewhat with these sketches. But we certainly don’t see it in the daily wear of ordinary people.

    Imagine showing the folks in 1893 today’s kids in hoodies and jeans. Or moms in yoga pants and cropped tees. It would blow their Victorian minds.

    Of course, no one can predict the future, and Mr. Gall in 1893 didn’t have the benefit of seeing the drastic shifts in clothing that we’ve witnessed over the past several generations. It’s hard to look outside of our own experience and timeline and imagine something totally different. Could we predict the next century of fashion? Would we even dare to try?

    Perhaps someone should, if only to provide some chuckles to our descendants 100 years from now.

Life Hacks

22 ‘oddly specific’ life hacks that could save you time, money, energy, or sanity

Nostalgia

17 Gen X candies kids of the ’80s are still pining for

Culture

Romeo is ‘cringe’: English teacher shares what Gen Z thinks about ‘Romeo & Juliet’

Generations

A new hopeful payphone project invites ‘Boomers’ and ‘Zoomers’ to connect one conversation at a time