Some Anti-Abortion Protestors Learn Some Abortion Facts From A Justifiably Angry Pregnant Woman

A pregnant woman walked into a debate with an anti-abortion protester and made her voice heard.

In the U.K., there are no protections for patients from anti-abortion protestors. As such, protestors can go right up to the front of a clinic, put up huge signs, and record everyone walking in and out of the establishment (which is a widely known intimidation tactic). The hope is that with enough intimidation, they can shame women who are struggling with a difficult and very personal decision into not going through with it.

A guy with a camera decided to confront them, and he was doing an OK job of it until this very pregnant woman showed up and explained in much clearer detail why their efforts were misguided, cruel, and unacceptable. The nice lady who has had enough starts chiming in at 1:13. A protestor who previously had an abortion gets the brunt of it.


As our friendly advocate puts it perfectly: "When you had your abortion, that was your choice. For you to be standing out here and making other women feel guilty is so wrong."

You can watch the whole thing here:

Don't get me wrong — I think everyone should be able to protest the things they disagree with. However, this is active intimidation of people who are in a medically vulnerable moment when they need all the support they can get. If protestors really cared about not traumatizing these women, they would protest outside a government building, not in the place where patients are trying to receive medical care.

People who want to force their personal beliefs onto other people's private lives and very personal decisions shouldn't be allowed to traumatize women. Intimidation isn't acceptable.

If you agree, it would be great if you shared this. You can donate to the charity that this woman works for (it helps neglected children) by clicking here.

More
True
NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation
Photo by Hunters Race on Unsplash

If you're a woman and you want to be a CEO, you should probably think about changing your name to "Jeffrey" or "Michael." Or possibly even "Michael Jeffreys" or "Jeffrey Michaels."

According to Fortune, last year, more men named Jeffrey and Michael became CEOs of America's top companies than women. A whopping total of one woman became a CEO, while two men named Jeffrey took the title, and two men named Michael moved into the C-suite as well.

The "New CEO Report" for 2018, which looks at new CEOS for the 250 largest S&P 500 companies, found that 23 people were appointed to the position of CEO. Only one of those 23 people was a woman. Michelle Gass, the new CEO of Kohl's, was the lone female on the list.

Keep Reading Show less
popular

Netflix

How much of what we do is influenced by what we see on TV? When it comes to risky behavior, Netflix isn't taking any chances.

After receiving a lot of heat, the streaming platform is finally removing a controversial scenedepicting teen suicide in season one of "13 Reasons Why. The decision comes two years after the show's release after statistics reveal an uptick in teen suicide.

"As we prepare to launch season three later this summer, we've been mindful about the ongoing debate around the show. So on the advice of medical experts, including Dr. Christine Moutier, Chief Medical Officer at the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, we've decided with creator Brian Yorkey and the producers to edit the scene in which Hannah takes her own life from season one," Netflix said in a statement, per The Hollywood Reporter.

Keep Reading Show less
Culture

At Trump's 'Social Media Summit' on Thursday, he bizarrely claimed Arnold Schwarzenegger had 'died' and he had witnessed said death. Wait, what?!


He didn't mean it literally - thank God. You can't be too sure! After all, he seemed to think that Frederick Douglass was still alive in February. More recently, he described a world in which the 1770s included airports. His laissez-faire approach to chronology is confusing, to say the least.

Keep Reading Show less
Democracy

Words matter. And they especially matter when we are talking about the safety and well-being of children.

While the #MeToo movement has shed light on sexual assault allegations that have long been swept under the rug, it has also brought to the forefront the language we use when discussing such cases. As a writer, I appreciate the importance of using varied wording, but it's vital we try to remain as accurate as possible in how we describe things.

There can be gray area in some topics, but some phrases being published by the media regarding sexual predation are not gray and need to be nixed completely—not only because they dilute the severity of the crime, but because they are simply inaccurate by definition.

One such phrase is "non-consensual sex with a minor." First of all, non-consensual sex is "rape" no matter who is involved. Second of all, most minors legally cannot consent to sex (the age of consent in the U.S. ranges by state from 16 to 18), so sex with a minor is almost always non-consensual by definition. Call it what it is—child rape or statutory rape, depending on circumstances—not "non-consensual sex."

Keep Reading Show less
Culture