Most Shared
A comedy writer tweeted about Jane Austen. It revealed a big flaw in publishing.
06.05.18
When most people think of Jane Austen's novels, they probably think of love and romance. But Jake Weisman doesn't.
In fact, according to a recent tweet from the Comedy Central writer, he wants to make his feelings clear that "Jane Austen does not write love stories."
He's not completely wrong. Jane Austen was funny.
<h2>She nailed satire, and her commentary on social mores during her time were ridiculously spot-on.</h2><p>But her stories also featured love. And romance. And (gasp!) feelings. That's not a bad thing. And Austen fans near and far chimed in to remind Weisman of exactly that.</p><iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" id="twitter-embed-1003556164347539456" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1003556164347539456&created_ts=1528101409.0&screen_name=TinyWriterLaura&text=This+is+such+a+male+take.+The+idea+that+Austen+couldn%E2%80%99t+have+been+writing+both+acerbic+and+insightful+social+commen%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FZkXzymMpi1&id=1003556164347539456&name=Laura+Elliott" frameborder="0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="VO14BC1559350452"></iframe><iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" id="twitter-embed-1003406497664167936" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1003406497664167936&created_ts=1528065726.0&screen_name=mcsullivan&text=Jane+Austen+wrote+about+class+and+money+and+the+snobbery+they+created+in+her+society%2C+and+how+love+brought+people+t%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2Ftr1hKUOGtL&id=1003406497664167936&name=Margaret+C.+Sullivan" frameborder="0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="4MFGSP1559350452"></iframe><iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" id="twitter-embed-1003417096192167937" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1003417096192167937&created_ts=1528068252.0&screen_name=_Ridley_&text=Well+ladies%2C+a+Man+has+very+thoughtfully+appeared+to+inform+us+that+we+didn%27t+accurately+pick+up+on+the+humor+in+th%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FBBIWxCYflL&id=1003417096192167937&name=Ridley" frameborder="0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="EHOWPQ1559350453"></iframe><p>Because — spoiler alert — literature can be more than one thing. It can be both satire <em>and</em> romance. It can be both mystery <em>and</em> adventure. It can be both comedy <em>and</em> science fiction. Books can even be all those things at the same time.</p><iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" id="twitter-embed-1003163794154119169" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1003163794154119169&created_ts=1528007861.0&screen_name=Kristen_ONeal&text=%40weismanjake+agreed+on+the+satirist+front%2C+but+she+can+be+viciously+funny+and+write+love+stories%0Aconsidering+romanc%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FWsQCjJ9QJi&id=1003163794154119169&name=Kristen+O%27Neal" frameborder="0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="28V7W11559350453"></iframe><iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" id="twitter-embed-1003461807879548929" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1003461807879548929&created_ts=1528078913.0&screen_name=violetesque&text=things+can+be+two+things.+%0A%0Awhether+you+place+value+on+one+of+those+things+or+not.+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2Fw8U5h54805&id=1003461807879548929&name=heather." frameborder="0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="O6FO9Z1559350453"></iframe><iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" id="twitter-embed-1003462907143819264" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1003462907143819264&created_ts=1528079175.0&screen_name=DaniOnTheFritz&text=It%E2%80%99s+possible+that+it%E2%80%99s+both%3F+Romance+and+satire.+%0AAlso%2C+can+we+stop+shaming+people+for+loving+the+romance+genre+or%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FmuBYmqyb20&id=1003462907143819264&name=Danielle+Fritz" frameborder="0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="U5C9RT1559350453"></iframe><h2>Clearly, Weisman's tweet struck a nerve, and it's not surprising. Often certain genres of books, <a href="http://www.upworthy.com/think-romance-novels-are-trash-that-s-a-stereotype-one-that-s-not-necessarily-true">like romance</a>, are largely written off or seen as less than. </h2><p>Why?</p><p><strong>Because the people who most often write and read those books are women. </strong></p><p>It's a real problem because the publishing industry, like so many others, tends to be very male centered.</p><p>Ever wondered why books written by women are often labeled "women's fiction" but books written by men are just "fiction"? It's because, historically, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2014/may/16/women-fiction-sign-sexist-book-industry" target="_blank">men have been the default and women the subcategory</a>. And attitudes like the one in Weisman's tweet are part of the reason. Those attitudes suggest that "love stories" are automatically beneath brilliant writers like Austen. And that only when her work is called something more "impressive" like "satire" is it worthy, which simply isn't true.</p><p>After all, books, like people, can have many layers — many brilliant parts of their whole.</p><iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" id="twitter-embed-1003593081365651456" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1003593081365651456&created_ts=1528110211.0&screen_name=TaylorWDriggers&text=Or+maybe+something+can+be+satire+%2Aand%2A+romance%2C+which+most+of+Austen%27s+work+clearly+is%3F%0A%0A%22Love+story%22+is+not+a+dirt%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FfEoPa80IZ1&id=1003593081365651456&name=Taylor+Driggers" frameborder="0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="OEXYMR1559350453"></iframe>
Keep Reading
Show less