In 1982, these men were sworn enemies. For 1 day in 2015, they became teammates.

Can you imagine shaking the hand of someone who once tried to kill you? It's almost unthinkable. But these men did it.

All photos by Ben Stansall/AFP/Getty Images.


Over 900 people died in the 1982 Falklands War, or the Guerra de la Malvinas. The 74-day confrontation between Argentina and the United Kingdom was fought for control over two island territories in the South Atlantic.

Sadly, the war's toll was much greater than just the death count as open wounds remain for many of its survivors even decades later.

But recently, veterans from both sides gathered to heal together. On the rugby field.

SAMA, the South Atlantic Medal Association, believes some 264 U.K. veterans have committed suicide in the years since the war. As for Argentinian veterans, many of them have banded together to seek justice for mistreatment and abuse that occurred at the hands of their own commanding officers.

But for one day, at least, the ugliness of the war was set aside to celebrate one of the things Argentina and the U.K. share: their love of rugby.

The match was organized by Rugby sans Frontieres (Rugby without Borders), a nonprofit built to spread social tolerance and solidarity through competition.

Argentinian and British veterans played side by side as both teammates and opponents.

The match was kept short – after all, most of the veterans are in their 50s now – and played with a ball blessed by Pope Francis.


Think they took it easy on each other? Not a chance.

But the message was clear; their days as enemies are over.

According to one veteran, "We were victims of circumstance. Politicians failed, and we had to go and try to fix what politicians did wrong."

The men didn't show up to debate Argentinian sovereignty or to air grievances or to mourn.

They were there to make peace.

The veterans even went out for a beer afterwards.

"The beauty of rugby is afterwards, we talk, we drink, and we laugh," 57-year-old vet David Jackson said.

"Reconciliation is important," said another. "This is an emotional moment."


33 years ago, these men were sworn enemies. Today they're brothers.

The fact that they were able to put aside their harrowing memories of the war and see their old foes as fathers, sons, brothers. As people. It's just...

...hell, I'll just say it. It's beautiful.

More

If you're a woman and you want to be a CEO, you should probably think about changing your name to "Jeffrey" or "Michael." Or possibly even "Michael Jeffreys" or "Jeffrey Michaels."

According to Fortune, last year, more men named Jeffrey and Michael became CEOs of America's top companies than women. A whopping total of one woman became a CEO, while two men named Jeffrey took the title, and two men named Michael moved into the C-suite as well.

The "New CEO Report" for 2018, which looks at new CEOS for the 250 largest S&P 500 companies, found that 23 people were appointed to the position of CEO. Only one of those 23 people was a woman. Michelle Gass, the new CEO of Kohl's, was the lone female on the list.

Keep Reading Show less
popular

How much of what we do is influenced by what we see on TV? When it comes to risky behavior, Netflix isn't taking any chances.

After receiving a lot of heat, the streaming platform is finally removing a controversial scenedepicting teen suicide in season one of "13 Reasons Why. The decision comes two years after the show's release after statistics reveal an uptick in teen suicide.

"As we prepare to launch season three later this summer, we've been mindful about the ongoing debate around the show. So on the advice of medical experts, including Dr. Christine Moutier, Chief Medical Officer at the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, we've decided with creator Brian Yorkey and the producers to edit the scene in which Hannah takes her own life from season one," Netflix said in a statement, per The Hollywood Reporter.

Keep Reading Show less
Culture

At Trump's 'Social Media Summit' on Thursday, he bizarrely claimed Arnold Schwarzenegger had 'died' and he had witnessed said death. Wait, what?!


He didn't mean it literally - thank God. You can't be too sure! After all, he seemed to think that Frederick Douglass was still alive in February. More recently, he described a world in which the 1770s included airports. His laissez-faire approach to chronology is confusing, to say the least.

Keep Reading Show less
Democracy

Words matter. And they especially matter when we are talking about the safety and well-being of children.

While the #MeToo movement has shed light on sexual assault allegations that have long been swept under the rug, it has also brought to the forefront the language we use when discussing such cases. As a writer, I appreciate the importance of using varied wording, but it's vital we try to remain as accurate as possible in how we describe things.

There can be gray area in some topics, but some phrases being published by the media regarding sexual predation are not gray and need to be nixed completely—not only because they dilute the severity of the crime, but because they are simply inaccurate by definition.

One such phrase is "non-consensual sex with a minor." First of all, non-consensual sex is "rape" no matter who is involved. Second of all, most minors legally cannot consent to sex (the age of consent in the U.S. ranges by state from 16 to 18), so sex with a minor is almost always non-consensual by definition. Call it what it is—child rape or statutory rape, depending on circumstances—not "non-consensual sex."

Keep Reading Show less
Culture