upworthy

karen

Pop Culture

Millennials are voting on which name represents their generation's 'Karen'

One name group is "fighting for their lives" to not be selected.

@erindiehart/TikTok

Did you name make the list?

Mention the name Karen, and you’re likely to get an immediate image of an aggravatingly entitled, middle-aged, and possibly (definitely) racist woman, who may or may not be donning a spiky short hairdo while asking to speak to the manager.

Well, now there’s a hilariously heated online debate about which Millennial name is the equivalent to that. Let’s see who’s been placed on the chopping block…

This game seemingly started with Erin Dieheart (@erindiehart), who declared that rather than have some boomer or Gen Zers choose the victim, Millennials should decide themselves who the “A-holes” of their generation are.

“I feel like WE should have a say so in this,” Diehart quipped.

@erindieheart

#millennialsoftiktok #karen #fyp #foryou

So what names were voted in? See below, and apologies in advance to 80s babies.

Ashley

Brittany

Heather

Amber

Tiffany

Jessica

Nicole

Becky

Kelsey

Honorable mentions:

Michelle

Lauren

Oy boy, did people have OPINIONS on this subject.

“IT’S ASHLEY. I DON’T EVEN HAVE TO WATCH THE REST.”

(As a millennial who was also an avid watcher of Recess, I’m inclined to agree with this comment. Not that anyone asked.)

@disneytva

Sorry, Spinelli, them's the rules 😔 . . . 🎥: Recess


“Beyoncé told us already. It’s Becky.”

“Brittany , Amber, Stephanie. The unholy trinity.”

“I pretty much agree with most except Heather. I’ve never met an evil Heather. They were introverted and docile.”

“You just named an entire cheer squad.”

Then, when it pretty much came down to two names—Jessica and Ashley—the former name began, as Diehart put it in a follow-up video, “fighting for their lives.”

@erindieheart

Replying to @It’s me! Jessica!

“PLEASE, I’m a good person!” one Jessica begged in the comments section.

“Please guys. The severe ADHD and anxiety in me can’t handle this,” pleaded another. “Leave us Jessicas alone. We already have to deal with ppl calling us Jessie and we hate it. Please we have too much trauma to be a Karen.

Ashleys, it seemed, weren’t so confident in defending themselves.

“As an Ashley I REBUKE this but my mom is named Karen so maybe it’s a sign,” one wrote.

Another admitted, “As an Ashley, I too have been victimized by an Ashley.”

While this is clearly all in good fun, it’s worth noting that the Karen stereotype has negatively affected the lives of countless actual Karens, many of whom have considered changing their own name as to avoid further damage. Statistically speaking, it isn't even women named Karen who end up being the major complainers of their age group. So now they face a punishment they don't necessarily deserve. Maybe we don’t want to continue this trend.

Or maybe I’m saying that out of self preservation, since my own name is among the finalists. Who knows?!

Since Diehart hasn't officially announced or finished collecting votes, you might want to give her a follow to find out what her final verdict will be. And, please, be nice to the Ashleys in your life when that happens.

via Melody Cooper / Twitter and Jamietoons / Twitter

A San Francisco lawmaker wants to clamp down on people who make racially-motivated 911 calls and it has a funny name.

San Francisco Supervisor Shamann Walton introduced an ordinance to outlaw racially-motivated 911 calls and it's called the CAREN Act. The acronym stands for Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies.

Over the past year or so there has been a rash of incidents where white women have called 911 to report people of color who make them uncomfortable while going about their daily lives.

These people are colloquially known as "Karens."


(Although there has been some push-back against the name Karen because it's used to propagate a stereotype against white women. Shouldn't those in the fight for racial justice stand against stereotypes even if they apply to the privileged?)

The calls put people of color in the dangerous positions of being arrested for a crime they didn't commit or an interaction with the police that turns violent.

Recently, there was the woman in Central Park who threatened to call the police on a Black bird-watcher who asked her to put her dog on a leash.

There was the woman in Oakland, California who called the police on a Black family having a cookout.

There was also the woman who called the police on a Black man stenciling "Black Lives Matter" on his own house.

The list goes on and on.

The new law is an attempt to punish those who think that they can use the police to intimidate people of color who aren't doing anything wrong. The bill is similar to California state Assembly member Rob Bonta's Assembly Bill 1550 that calls for consequences for those who use law enforcement to based on biases toward race, class, outward appearance and religion.

Walton says both measures "are part of a larger nationwide movement to address racial biases and implement consequences for weaponizing emergency resources with racist intentions."

"This bill could protect millions of Californians from becoming targets of hate and prevent the weaponization of our law enforcement against communities of color," Bonta said in an online release.

Los Angeles City Councilman Curren Price introduced a similar bill recently to explore "criminal penalties, rights of victims to bring private civil actions and cost recovery by the City."

The passed, the bills would work to give people pause before thinking they should use the police as a way to carry our their racial grievances or discomfort. They will also prevent law enforcement from having to dedicate resources to calls that aren't important.

Hopefully, the bill will also allow all the women who've had to deal with being named Karen over the past year to sleep easy knowing that their name is no longer attached to an ethnic stereotype.