Lawyer's argument on why babies should only take their mother's last name goes viral
For Dr. Proudman, it's about responsibility.
At this point in human history, it seems somewhat arbitrary that children almost always receive their fathers’ last names. A lawyer in London, England, made the case that babies should be named after their mother, and it caused a bit of a stir on X (formerly known as Twitter.)
On August 9, Dr. Charlotte Proudman tweeted: “A message to pregnant women — please give the baby your surname. You carried a baby for 9 months, gave birth, and will be responsible for that child for the rest of your life. When you’re registering the baby, ask yourself: why is the father’s surname more important than yours?”
The tweet received 5.3 million views and over 34,000 likes.
Many responded by explaining why babies tend to take the names of their fathers. However, should those reasons apply today? Many also said that giving a child the father’s name makes them more likely to want to care for the child, but that’s setting the bar pretty low for men.
The point is to make the father feel responsible for the child.
— David Pinsen (@dpinsen) August 10, 2023
From patronymics to trade professions learnt from your father to dynasties named after a common ancestors title, yes its long been the default in the West to refer to ones parents via their male line
— Placeholder (@_Plac3_hold3r) August 10, 2023
I'd assume it started because going wayy back last names would originally be based around your family profession, and the father would be the one working and therefore pass on his name and profession, it would be nonsensical for the mother to pass on the name of her father.
— Dom 🌻 (@Vladispook) August 10, 2023
Even though there were good reasons for passing down the father’s name in the past, why should they matter in 2023 when the world is drastically different?
Traditional solutions are to problems long forgotten.
— Elliot Hammer (@ElliotHammerSR) August 15, 2023
While some fought for tradition and others cheered for an outright reversal of naming customs to catch up with the times, others thought people should do what they feel is best for their families instead of conforming to someone else’s ideas.
Or everyone can just do whatever they want and we don't have to make it a thing
— Triggery Fingers (@triggeryfingers) August 10, 2023
I think it’s my choice what surname I give, rather than feeling some obligation for my maiden surname.
— Emma Nash 🕷🇪🇺 (@DrEmmaNash) August 9, 2023
Everyone is free to have whatever opinion they choose on baby surnames. But Dr. Proudman’s tweet does bring up one significant issue. Just because we’ve always done something one way doesn’t always make it right. No tradition is sacred enough to be beyond reevaluation.
- 7 couples who combined last names and the amazing reasons they did it. ›
- 17 assumptions modern newlyweds are sick of people making about their marriages. ›
- Wife says husband's last name is so awful she can't give it to her kids. Is she right? ›
- Lawyer refuses to sign waivers of liability for her child - Upworthy ›
- Divorce lawyer cries recalling case he shouldn't have won - Upworthy ›