The first Republican in Congress has signed on to an assault weapons ban


Rep. Peter King (R-NY) is a name you should remember. If you don't follow politics closely, remember his name because he's the first Republican in Congress to openly join the call for a renewed federal ban on assault weapons.

If you're a Democrat or a diehard progressive partisan, remember his name because it's proof that as a nation we can put principles before party and walk across the political aisle to get things done.

If you're a Republican, remember his name as evidence that real leadership in politics sometimes means risking your reputation to do what is right even when most of your colleagues disagree or lack the political courage to go first.

But let's allow Rep. King to explain himself in his own words:


"They are weapons of mass slaughter," he explained on Monday. "I don't see any need for them in everyday society."

And that just about sums it up. You can believe in the Second Amendment as an unbreakable protection of the individual right to bear arms and still recognize the limits for a functioning, decent society.

201 Democrats have already signed on to the 2019 bill that would renew a federal assault weapons ban that was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1994 and stood in place until George W. Bush allowed it to expire under his presidency.

In the U.S. Senate, 30 Democratic Senators have signed onto a similar bill sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA).

King is from a so-called swing district in New York, meaning it's not unusual for him to take moderate stances. He's also the co-sponsor of a bill in the House that would expand federal background checks for potential new gun owners.


Related: Another Methodist teen rejects church membership before the entire congregation to protest anti-LGBT policies

But in today's era of heightened focus on mass shootings, King's decision to support an assault weapons ban doesn't make him a partisan extremist, it makes him a sensible moderate backing simple legislation that a majority of Americans support. And in today's climate that small act of common sense and courage is an act of "extremism" in the best possible sense.

King knows what that means. It could save lives. It could transform our national diglogue about guns. But it's a long, hard road to walk. Still, if his small act gets the ball rolling, it will mark a turning point for the better in the political history of modern America. And for that reason alone, we should remember Rep. Peter King's name today.

This article originally appeared on November 11, 2015


Remember those beloved Richard Scarry books from when you were a kid?

Like a lot of people, I grew up reading them. And now, I read them to my kids.

The best!

If that doesn't ring a bell, perhaps this character from the "Busytown" series will. Classic!

Image via

Scarry was an incredibly prolific children's author and illustrator. He created over 250 books during his career. His books were loved across the world — over 100 million were sold in many languages.

But here's something you may not have known about these classics: They've been slowly changing over the years.

Don't panic! They've been changing in a good way.

Keep Reading Show less
Photo by Maxim Hopman on Unsplash

The Sam Vimes "Boots" Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness explains one way the rich get richer.

Any time conversations about wealth and poverty come up, people inevitably start talking about boots.

The standard phrase that comes up is "pull yourself up by your bootstraps," which is usually shorthand for "work harder and don't ask for or expect help." (The fact that the phrase was originally used sarcastically because pulling oneself up by one's bootstraps is literally, physically impossible is rarely acknowledged, but c'est la vie.) The idea that people who build wealth do so because they individually work harder than poor people is baked into the American consciousness and wrapped up in the ideal of the American dream.

A different take on boots and building wealth, however, paints a more accurate picture of what it takes to get out of poverty.

Keep Reading Show less

"Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" (1937) and actor Peter Dinklage.

On Tuesday, Upworthy reported that actor Peter Dinklage was unhappy with Disney’s decision to move forward with a live-action version of “Snow White and the Seven Drawfs” starring Rachel Zegler.

Dinklage praised Disney’s inclusive casting of the “West Side Story” actress, whose mother is of Colombian descent, but pointed out that, at the same time, the company was making a film that promotes damaging stereotypes about people with dwarfism.

"There's a lot of hypocrisy going on, I've gotta say, from being somebody who's a little bit unique," Dinklage told Marc Maron on his “WTF” podcast.

"Well, you know, it's really progressive to cast a—literally no offense to anybody, but I was a little taken aback by, they were very proud to cast a Latino actress as Snow White," Dinklage said, "but you're still telling the story of 'Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.' Take a step back and look at what you're doing there.”

Keep Reading Show less