Facebook is critical to our success and we could use your help. It will only take a few clicks on your device. But it would mean the world to us.
Here’s the link . Once there, hit the Follow button. Hit the Follow button again and choose Favorites. That’s it!
If you’d like to know why this is so important for us, you can read more about it here .
Can outsider beavers save this dried up river?
It's not easy being a river in the desert under the best of circumstances. The ecosystem exists in a very delicate balance, allowing water sources to thrive in the harsh conditions. These water sources in otherwise extremely dry areas are vital to the survival of unique wildlife, agriculture, and even tourism as they provide fresh drinking water for the people who live nearby.
But man-made problems like climate change, over-farming, and pollution have made a tough job even tougher in some areas. Rivers in Utah and Colorado that are part of the Colorado River Basin have been barely surviving the extremely harsh drought season. When the riverbeds get too dry, fish and other aquatic creatures die off and the wildfire risk increases dramatically.
About six years ago, one team of researchers had a fascinating idea to restore the health of some of Utah's most vulnerable rivers: Bring in the beavers.
Beaver in water. Photo by Svetozar Cenisev on Unsplash
In 2019, master's student Emma Doden and a team of researchers from Utah State University began a "translocation" project to bring displaced beavers to areas like Utah's Price River, in the hopes of bringing it back to life.
Why beavers? It just makes dam sense! (Sorry.)
Beaver dams restrict the flow of water in some areas of a river, creating ponds and wetlands. In drought-stricken areas, fish and other wildlife can take refuge in the ponds while the rest of the river runs dry, thus riding out the danger until it rains again.
When beavers are present in a watershed, the benefits are unbelievable: Better water quality, healthier fish populations, better nutrient availability, and fewer or less severe wildfires.
It's why beavers have earned the title of "keystone species," or any animal that has a disproportionate impact on the ecosystem around them.
Doden and her team took beavers who were captured or removed from their original homes due to being a "nuisance," interfering with infrastructure, or being in danger, and—after a short period of quarantine—were brought to the Price River.
Despite the research team's best efforts, not all the translocated beavers have survived or stayed put over the years. Some have trouble adapting to their new home and die off or are killed by predators, while others leave of their own accord.
But enough have stayed and built dams since 2019 that the team is starting to see the results of the effort. In fact, beaver projects just like this one have been going on all over the state in recent years.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
The water levels in the river are now the healthiest they've been in years. The fish are thriving. Residents of Utah are overjoyed at the results of the experiment.
A column in The Salt Lake Tribune from 2025 (six years after the beaver translocation began) writes that the revitalization of the Price River "helped save our Utah town."
"A tributary of the Colorado River, the Price River runs through downtown Helper. On a warm day, you’re likely to find the river filled with tourists and locals kayaking, tubing and fishing along its shore. A decade ago, it was hard to imagine this scene—and the thriving recreation economy that comes with it—was possible."
Of course, it wasn't JUST the beavers. Other federal water cleanup investments helped remove debris, break down old and malfunctioning dams, and place tighter regulations on agriculture grazing in the area that depleted vital plant life.
But the experts know that the beavers, and their incredible engineering work, are the real MVPs.
An actual beaver dam on the now-thriving Price RiverPublic Domain
In other drying, struggling rivers in the area, researchers are bringing in beavers and even creating manmade beaver dams. They're hoping that the critters will take over the job as the rivers get healthier.
Utah's San Rafael river, which is in bleak condition, is a prime candidate. In on area of the river, a natural flood inspired a host of beavers to return to the area and "riparian habitat along that stretch had increased by 230%, and it had the most diverse flow patterns of anywhere on the river," according to KUER.
It's hard to believe that beavers nearly went extinct during the heyday of the fur trapping industry, and continued to struggle as they were considered nuisances and pests. Now, they're getting the respect they deserve as engineer marvels, and their populations have rebounded due to better PR and conservation programs.
To that I say...it's about dam time!
Why do some people shoot up to manager positions while others stay behind?
Following the smashing television sensation, Succession, and later, Industry, it’s no surprise that everyone is clamoring for their way up the corporate ladder. However, real life is nothing like the glossy—albeit, depressing—floors of Waystar Royco; in the real world there are evil bosses, annoying coworkers, and pesky KPIs that need to be dealt with, leaving many workers wondering, “Is this really what I signed up for?”
That’s at the heart of this question posted to r/careerguidance on Reddit, anyway. User @Ok-Living5146 asked, “What is the secret to some people moving up fast in their careers while others don’t?”
They added some context, writing, “I’ve been in the same ‘level’ of job for years, and it has been frustrating watching people with less experience or less education soar up into these big roles. I’ll often see Directors who have less education or years in the field than I do, or people who randomly shoot up into manager positions or even higher. What exactly is the secret?”
Reddit, as it frequently does, responded in droves. We’ve compiled 10 of the best advice nuggets, below.
How much does "being good and looking tall" matter in a corporate setting?Photo credit: Canva
For @fortyeightD, success in a corporate context looks an awful like a grocery shopping list. The user rattles off different attributes to succeeding at work, writing:
“Charisma. Communication skills. Building rapport with the right people. Being good and looking tall. Confidence. Ability to make a decision under pressure. Public speaking skills. Being someone who others respect and look up to. Good grooming and dress sense and hygiene. Being reliable. Being positive and not complaining. Sharing the CEO’s LinkedIn posts. Sucking up. Matching the manager’s biases/preferences for age/race/religion/gender. Giving the appearance of going above and beyond for the company. Nepotism. Attending all social functions and chatting to senior leaders and telling them their ideas are brilliant. Taking on extra responsibilities like joining committees. Working on high-visibility projects. Being the spokesperson in any group situation.”
They also added,
“Record metrics for anything that you work on, so you can tell your manager hard numbers about how you have improved things. For example customer satisfaction, reducing expenses, increasing sales, reducing tickets, etc.”
Easy, right?
Another person jokingly replied, “Yea, I’m not moving up.”
User @Deep-Library-8041 shared a great anecdote:
“Only thing I’d add is being vocal about career goals and wanting to move up. I was on a small team of three—me and another person with the same title, plus our manager. After getting settled into the role, in our 1:1’s I shared my career goals and asked for help getting there. So over the course of three years she introduced me to people; when an opportunity popped up she put me forward, supported me when I had new ideas, etc. And at each annual review, I put a lot of effort into showing evidence of my growth, ambition, and results.
My colleague stayed silent. She never spoke up, tried to gain visibility, said no to new projects, etc. I know she’s resentful, but people aren’t mind readers. Be the squeaky wheel—know what you want and ask to be coached how to get there.”
Another prescient commenter added,
“Sounds like you had an excellent manager.”
To which, @Deep-Library-8041 replied, “Yes—should edit to add that you need a supportive manager to make this happen!”
This one unfolded like a duet, told in two parts. The first, from @billsil, who wrote:
“I asked my friend who was in a VP level role at 27. She told me she knew the product top to bottom better than anyone because she had done such a variety of things on it. The CEO trusted her to tell her the truth, which was an ongoing problem of yes-men.
She had quite the target on her back and dealt with a lot of shit from other people, but she only took shots at people who deserved it. Having dealt with them, I was happy someone could put them in their place.”
If you find a company that values your contributions, you will know. Photo credit: Canva
Then, @tennisgoddes1 replied,
“Spot on for generally any company. If you work at a good company that values your contributions and leadership skills, you will know immediately if you are at one of those companies because your skills will be recognized. Respect for your input and experience will be given. It’s quite refreshing.”
A dose of reality, shared by @senpai07373:
“You need to realize one important thing. You do not progress simply because you are good at your work, and you work for many years. If you want to progress, you have to show that you have skills needed to level up job. You can be the most brilliant specialist with 15 years of experience, yet you still might not have the capacity to be manager, not to mention director. Being great at your work can and should give your bonus, can and should get you a raise. But just being great at your work is not the most important thing when you look for progress.”
Some career coaching, courtesy of @throwawayOnTheWayO (who seems like they read Machiavelli’s The Prince or The Art of War a few hundred times):
“Knowing how to play the game is an extremely valuable skill, the most valuable skill, in fact.
No one cares how long you’ve worked at a company. Why would they? If someone came in and was able to learn in 1 year everything that you did in your 5 years, then more power to them. The state of the company right now is probably nothing like it was 5 years ago, and leadership’s plans for the future may include not wanting anything from the past to keep it down.
Companies that grow and make money do so because of smart decisions by competent leadership. They don’t just happen to make money and happen to stay in business for years or decades on dumb luck. It is not easy to keep a company up and running. Once you recognize that most leaders are actually competent and are dealing with numerous variables that you have no knowledge or understanding of, then you can drop your cynicism and start to move up.
Leadership requires effective social skills and the ability to navigate hierarchies, in addition to the skills necessary to handle the day to day of the job.”
User @Momjamoms offered some wisdom, commenting:
“Through my decades in corporate America, I've seen lots of people work really really hard hoping they'll be noticed and promoted because they were taught that hard work pays off. In reality, it never works that way. Career movement itself is a skill that requires stellar communication skills and constant, active campaigning.”
To which, another user replied:
“This. It has nothing to do with your ability to do your job. It is all about people skills.”
Sometimes, the grass really is greener in the other pasture, reminds user @Ok_Push2550. They wrote,
“Changing jobs.
If you've been there for years (5 or more), and haven't left, why should they promote you? If you're doing well enough to not get fired, then they can hire from outside to get someone with more talent and drive to do something big.
If you go somewhere else, it signals to your new employer (and old employer) that you're not satisfied with what you have, and want more.”
A different user agreed, commenting:
“Exactly this. That is how I got promoted twice over the past 7 years, applying for a better position in two companies. That's also how I doubled my salary while my colleague from the first job is still in the same position even though we started on the same day.”
For a more measured, achievable response, look to @OGP01, who wrote:
“Multiple moves into slightly bigger roles. Makes them look experienced.
Building good relationships with senior leaders. Talking to them regularly.
Being known for their team's achievements that they enabled. But at the same time praising members of their team for delivering these results.
Confidence. Being able to bullshit their way through anything, even if they haven’t got a clue what they’re talking about.”
Although, if you want a true cheat code, @Willing-Bit2581 has the answer:
“Build a relationship with someone in the C-Suite, that can put you on a track… I've witnessed a 35-year-old woman got from Audit Manager to Sr. Manager to Director to AVP in less than 5 years. She’s clearly being groomed for higher roles.
Saw another woman in late thirties, some went from Sr. Analyst to VP in less than 10 years.”
Another dose of likeability reality, this time, from @Significant_Soup2558:
“Likability often trumps competence. People promote people they enjoy working with, people who make their lives easier, and people who fit the company culture.
This is how you do it. Favor visibility over competence. Treat networking as part of the job, both within and outside the company. Understand that perception is reality. Be strategic about job changes. Use a service like Applyre to job search passively.
Your education and experience matter, but they're table stakes. The people passing you by figured out that career advancement is a different skill set entirely from doing the actual work well.”
People skills matter in workplace. Photo credit: Canva
So, will you be taking the advice from these expert corporate Redditors? See you in the C-Suite.
An anxious person covers their face. Sheet music.
What if we could reframe the way we view anxiety? Instead of it being this negative, festering nuisance, could it be finessed into something that's ultimately positive?
Well, psychologist Rollo May–who was often considered one of the most renowned existential psychologists/philosophers of his time–believed that the way many of us think about anxiety is all wrong. In 1950, May released his book The Meaning of Anxiety, which was revised and re-released in 1977, and sought to challenge the belief that anxiety is a "bad" emotion. Instead, May suggests it's a feeling that should serve as a reminder to "take action."
Archivo:Rollo May USD Alcalá 1977.jpg - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia ... es.m.wikipedia.org
Of the latter 1977 release, Goodreads describes it as, "the first modern book on anxiety following Freud and Kierkegaard. May challenges the idea that 'mental health is living without anxiety,' believing it is essential to being human. He explores how it can relieve boredom, sharpen sensibilities, and produce the tension necessary to preserve human existence."
The gist is that anxiety can't be ignored as it's such a normal part of the human condition. Instead, it should be used as a guide to cultivate knowledge, spring into action, and enhance creativity.
In the late 1980s, May sat for an interview entitled "The Human Dilemma with Rollo May" as part of Jeffrey Mishlove's Thinking Allowed series. Among many ideas discussed, Mishlove asks, "When you speak of anxiety, you don't think of it as a symptom to be removed, but rather as a gateway for exploration into the meaning of life."
May gives a resounding, "Yes, you got that exactly!" He adds, "I think anxiety is associated with creativity. When you're in a situation of anxiety, you can of course run away from it and that's certainly not constructive." He then exemplifies the "no-nonsense" approach he was often known for: "You could take a bunch of pills to get over it or cocaine or whatever else you may take."
Mishlove interjects, "You could meditate." May responds, "You could meditate. But I think none of those things, including meditation–which I happen to believe in–but none of those paths lead you to creative activity."
"What anxiety means," he continues, "is it's as though the world were knocking at your door. That you need to create. You need to make something. You need to DO something. And I think anxiety, thus, is well for people who have found their own heart and their own souls. For them, it is a stimulus toward creativity, toward courage. It's what makes us human beings."
The full interview contains a moment when Mishlove states, "I suppose much of anxiety comes from the basic human dilemma of being mortal. Of ultimately having to confront our own demise."
-Jeffrey Mishlove's Thinking Allowed series with guest Rollo May www.youtube.com
May answers, in part: "Man is the only creature—men, women and children sometimes, even—who can be aware of their death. And out of that comes normal anxiety. When I can let myself FEEL that, I apply myself to new ideas. I write books. I communicate with my fellows. In other words, the creative interchange of human personality rests upon the fact that we know we're going to die…Our knowledge of our death is what gives us a normal anxiety that says to us to make the most of these years you are alive. And that's what I've tried to do."
Mishlove also points out, "Another source of anxiety you've described in your writing, is our very freedom. The ability to make choices and to have to confront the consequences of those choices." May once again agrees. "Freedom is also the mother of anxiety. If you had no freedom, you'd have no anxiety."
He's essentially stating that again, anxiety comes from the very act of being aware of our own consciousness. "Those of us who do have anxiety are alert, alive. We're aware that what we do matters. We only have about 70 or 80 or 90 years in which to do it, so why not do it and get joy out of it, rather than running away from it?'
The comments sections across the board are full of insightful thoughts. This person sums it up nicely: "Our existential freedom is what allows us to feel anxiety and despair; this, in turn, gives rise to creativity, growth, understanding, and joy. It's almost like anxiety and creativity are two sides of the same coin."
A scene from the musical Les Misérables
Some love simply can't be expressed without a flash mob. And singing. Lots and lots of singing. For TV writer, producer, and actor Gary Janetti, this was the case. On the 10th wedding anniversary with his husband, popular TV stylist Brad Goreski, Janetti secretly gathered friends, family, and professional singers to pop up and sing "One Day More" from the hit musical Les Misérables (based on Victor Hugo's novel of the same name). And it was anything but miserable.
A poster for the musical Les Miserables on a tall building. Photo by Samuel Regan-Asante on Unsplash
First shared publicly on Goreski's Bravo TV show It's a Brad, Brad World, this moment has been bringing people joy for over a decade. Here's how it went down: In the resurfaced Instagram clip, which Janetti rcently posted to honor their 24th wedding anniversary, Goreski is seated in a chair outside. It seems as though a man is serenading him with the fight song "One More Day." Encapsulating the Jean Valjean character, he stands in front of the crowd and sings his heart out. But then, out of nowhere, singer Jonah Platt (who happened to have worked with Janetti on Will & Grace) appears to sing Marius's part of the song. "I did not live until today," he croons. "How can I live when we are parted?"
Goreski is already beside himself, showing off a huge smile. That's when Trish (Brad's college friend, as written on the chyron) pops in to sing Cosette's beautiful soprano duet with Platt. "Tomorrow you'll be worlds away. And yet with you my world has started." Goreski audibly gasps as his delight cannot be contained.
And just like that, Goreski and Janetti's friend Megan Mullally (a Broadway star in her own right, best known to many as Karen from Will & Grace) stands and sings Éponine's heartbreaking solo. "One more day, I'm on my own. One more day with him not caring. What a life I might have known. But he never saw me there," she sings, nailing it. Goreski laughs and exclaims, "Shut uuuuup, oh my God!" as the crowd cheers.
From the back, we hear a booming voice belonging to Goreski and Janetti's friend, Alec. The crowd shifts to watch as he sings a battle cry, "One more day before the storm…" as the others continue their parts. At this point, Goreski just doesn't know WHERE to look, as there are so many surprises. Much of the audience swarms the stage to sing as "chorus" when Janetti himself finds his inner-Javert and sings, "One more day to revolution, we will nip it in the bud. We'll be ready for these schoolboys, we will wet themselves with blood."
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Just when it couldn't get more perfect, Goreski's own mother, Debbie, stands up and sings her solo, complete with cockney accent. At this point, Goreski is stomping his feet with happiness. The guests/chorus begin marching on stage as we flash to their friend James, who, of course, is also singing. People get hoisted up, as does a bright red flag—which luckily turns out NOT to be a metaphor for their marriage.
The crowd gasps and applauds as the flash mob brings it home. Goreski leads the much-earned standing ovation.
Lin Manuel Miranda at the Tony Awards. Giphy
The comments are nearly as delightful as the performance. Janetti explains, "Today is our 24th anniversary. I threw this flash mob for Brad for our 10th. I’ve been coasting off it ever since." To which Goreski hilariously retorts, "You sure have because I haven’t received an anniversary present from you since then."
Some beg the question many of us might have: "I’ll still never understand how all your friends and family are casually THIS good at singing."
Many point out how wonderful and inventive and romantic it all is. Though, a few were saddened this hasn't been done for them. As one puts it, "Well now I'm just mad at my husband...."
There's a reason why some people can perfectly copy accents, and others can't