Excuse me while I point out something great about this Jim Carrey clip everyone is talking about.

Let's take a deeper look at what made this sketch so dang awesome.

Ed. Note: Unfortunately, the video has been removed by NBC Universal. You'll just have to imagine it.

If you saw the Jim Carrey/Iggy Azalea episode of "Saturday Night Live," you saw the Halloween sketch in which Carrey and Kate McKinnon parodied Sia's "Chandelier" music video which features an intricate contemporary modern dance routine.


Don't get me wrong: Their performances were great, but my favorite part of the sketch happened before those two even showed up on stage, when Vanessa Bayer's character is trying to figure out what her coworkers' costumes are supposed to be.

Vanessa Bayer tries to guess her co-workers' Halloween costumes. Image from "Saturday Night Live."

We'd all love to think that we don't treat people differently based on their race, or gender, or body shape, or whatever — but the unfortunate truth is that we all do it a little bit sometimes. Halloween is supposed to be a time when we can all dress up as other people, characters, objects, and/or really bad puns.

The beginning of this sketch really shows how, even when it comes to Halloween — or any costumed event (shoutout to Comic Con and Purim!) — things like race, gender, age, and/or body shape become the things that we have trouble letting people shed even though they're pretending to be someone or something else.

Sasheer Zamata is Vanna White. Would that be your first guess? Image from "Saturday Night Live."

So what did I mean by that? In this sketch, Bayer's character isn't a cartoonishly evil racist or maliciously fatphobic. She doesn't intend to offend anyone. But she does make some accidentally offensive assumptions about her coworkers' costumes.

First Bayer assumes that Sasheer Zamata is dressed as Rihanna or Beyoncé because she's wearing a long sparkly dress and long blonde wig, but more significantly because she's black. Her first guess isn't the correct answer — Vanna White — because Vanna White is, well, white, even though Sasheer's costume is spot on.

Aidy Bryant is assumed to be dressed as a meatball or a marble — not because she's wearing a meatball or marble costume, but because she happens to be wearing a red dress, and more significantly, because of her body shape.

Aidy Bryant's character forgot to wear a costume. Image from "Saturday Night Live."

The butt of the joke here isn't Sasheer or Aidy. The butt of the joke is Vanessa Bayer's character — the person who is using tired stereotypes. We should laugh at people who use stereotypes. We shouldn't laugh at stereotypes. And this sketch pulls that off brilliantly.

**JUST TO BE CLEAR, because some people are sending me angry, confused e-mails: I think this sketch is fantastic. It is not offensive. It does not make fun of stereotypes, it makes fun of people who stereotype other people. In the comedy world that's called "punching up." **

More

On an old episode of "The Oprah Winfrey Show" in July 1992, Oprah put her audience through a social experiment that puts racism in a new light. Despite being nearly two decades old, it's as relevant today as ever.

She split the audience members into two groups based on their eye color. Those with brown eyes were given preferential treatment by getting to cut the line and given refreshments while they waited to be seated. Those with blue eyes were made to put on a green collar and wait in a crowd for two hours.

Staff were instructed to be extra polite to brown-eyed people and to discriminate against blue-eyed people. Her guest for that day's show was diversity expert Jane Elliott, who helped set up the experiment and played along, explaining that brown-eyed people were smarter than blue-eyed people.

Watch the video to see how this experiment plays out.

Oprah's Social Experiment on Her Audience www.youtube.com

Culture
via Cadbury

Cadbury has removed the words from its Dairy Milk chocolate bars in the U.K. to draw attention to a serious issue, senior loneliness.

On September 4, Cadbury released the limited-edition candy bars in supermarkets and for every one sold, the candy giant will donate 30p (37 cents) to Age UK, an organization dedicated to improving the quality of life for the elderly.

Cadbury was prompted to help the organization after it was revealed that 225,000 elderly people in the UK often go an entire week without speaking to another person.

Keep Reading Show less
Well Being

Young people today are facing what seems to be greater exposure to complex issues like mental health, bullying, and youth violence. As a result, teachers are required to be well-versed in far more than school curriculum to ensure students are prepared to face the world inside and outside of the classroom. Acting as more than teachers, but also mentors, counselors, and cheerleaders, they must be equipped with practical and relevant resources to help their students navigate some of the more complicated social issues – though access to such tools isn't always guaranteed.

Take Dr. Jackie Sanderlin, for example, who's worked in the education system for over 25 years, and as a teacher for seven. Entering the profession, she didn't anticipate how much influence a student's home life could affect her classroom, including "students who lived in foster homes" and "lacked parental support."

Dr. Jackie Sanderlin, who's worked in the education system for over 25 years.

Valerie Anglemyer, a middle school teacher with more than 13 years of experience, says it can be difficult to create engaging course work that's applicable to the challenges students face. "I think that sometimes, teachers don't know where to begin. Teachers are always looking for ways to make learning in their classrooms more relevant."

So what resources do teachers turn to in an increasingly fractured world? "Joining a professional learning network that supports and challenges thinking is one of the most impactful things that a teacher can do to support their own learning," Anglemyer says.

Valerie Anglemyer, a middle school teacher with more than 13 years of experience.

A new program for teachers that offers this network along with other resources is the WE Teachers Program, an initiative developed by Walgreens in partnership with ME to WE and Mental Health America. WE Teachers provides tools and resources, at no cost to teachers, looking for guidance around the social issues related to poverty, youth violence, mental health, bullying, and diversity and inclusion. Through online modules and trainings as well as a digital community, these resources help them address the critical issues their students face.

Jessica Mauritzen, a high school Spanish teacher, credits a network of support for providing her with new opportunities to enrich the learning experience for her students. "This past year was a year of awakening for me and through support… I realized that I was able to teach in a way that built up our community, our school, and our students, and supported them to become young leaders," she says.

With the new WE Teachers program, teachers can learn to identify the tough issues affecting their students, secure the tools needed to address them in a supportive manner, and help students become more socially-conscious, compassionate, and engaged citizens.

It's a potentially life-saving experience for students, and in turn, "a great gift for teachers," says Dr. Sanderlin.

"I wish I had the WE Teachers program when I was a teacher because it provides the online training and resources teachers need to begin to grapple with these critical social issues that plague our students every day," she adds.

In addition to the WE Teachers curriculum, the program features a WE Teachers Award to honor educators who go above and beyond in their classrooms. At least 500 teachers will be recognized and each will receive a $500 Walgreens gift card, which is the average amount teachers spend out-of-pocket on supplies annually. Teachers can be nominated or apply themselves. To learn more about the awards and how to nominate an amazing teacher, or sign up for access to the teacher resources available through WE Teachers, visit walgreens.com/metowe.

WE Teachers
True
Walgreens
via KGW-TV / YouTube

One of the major differences between women and men is that women are often judged based on their looks rather than their character or abilities.

"Men as well as women tend to establish the worth of individual women primarily by the way their body looks, research shows. We do not do this when we evaluate men," Naomi Ellemers Ph.D. wrote in Psychology Today.

Dr. Ellers believes that this tendency to judge a woman solely on her looks causes them to be seen as an object rather than a person.

Keep Reading Show less
Culture