Rubenstein Communications – The Honest Truth

File folder link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_EO4iY_fvXcZmVZY3VlOTdDUFE Posting requirements: URL: https://www.callofdutyendowment.org/rnrnttk 6/6/2016: rnrn— Unemployment among young veterans is nearly triple the national average.rn>>> Yes NEARLY, buuuuut it’s kind of got some problems. But I’m giving it a pass, owing to different possible interpretations and the fact that unemployment rates fluctuate constantly and that although I’m looking at 2015…

File folder link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_EO4iY_fvXcZmVZY3VlOTdDUFE

Posting requirements:
URL: https://www.callofdutyendowment.org/rnrnttk 6/6/2016: rnrn— Unemployment among young veterans is nearly triple the national average.rn>>> Yes NEARLY, buuuuut it’s kind of got some problems. But I’m giving it a pass, owing to different possible interpretations and the fact that unemployment rates fluctuate constantly and that although I’m looking at 2015 numbers (most recent data available), they may be looking at a different data set, and even the slightest change in unemployment rates for young veterans, all veterans, or all civilians (which is completely plausible) would easily lend this full support: rnrnHere were my findings and logic:rn(1) It’s *really* more like “more than double,” not “nearly triple” when comparing 18-24YO veterans (13%) with all civilians (5.2%). rn(2) The wording *could* be phrased to mean the national average for all veterans (not civilians), in which case “triple” is spot-on in comparing 18-24YO veterans (13%) with all veterans (4.2%). rn(3) HOWEVER, if they were meaning to compare 18-24YO veterans (13%) with 18-24YO civilians (10.9%), it would definitely not be triple — but that doesn’t seem implied in the wording. It feels like it’s either a comparison to all veterans or all civilians with the vid’s emphasis on “young” and “veteran” being what is setting this group apart. rnrnThe numbers I’m seeing/using/assuming they used are Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers for 2015. (Sources: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000 and https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/vet.pdf (Table 2A)). Looking more widely at trends across other years, even a slight change in figures (up on one and down on the other) would make it full-on accurate. I’m willing to give the benefit of the doubt that other equally-feasible-to-use numbers would support this completely.
Source:
Rubenstein Communications
Contact name:
Joy Phillips
Contact email:
jphillips@rubenstein.com

[html5_video https://upworthy-videos.rbl.ms/backup/57557f8cd0c0f8002000002a/uploads/5b05b8d8b73198001799fcf9/The_Honest_Truth_60_v13B%20%281%29.mov]

Download original file here

[rebelmouse-document-srt 5298 original_filename=”the_honest_truth_60_v13b+1.srt”]

Download original file here

Making Sense of Science

If you see a person and two dogs in this photo, look again. It’s an optical illusion.

Nature

Wildlife researchers discover tigers doing something we previously thought went against their very nature

Science

Simple ’30-second rule’ can help you win every conversation, even if you’re a little awkward

Science

Former Secret Service agent reveals ‘spy trick’ for getting someone to do exactly what you want