Helen Mirren slams drunk drivers in this epic, hilarious Super Bowl ad.

Yet another reason to love Helen Mirren.

If you've ever had one too many and gotten behind the wheel of a car, Dame Helen Mirren has a few choice words for you.

The world's indisputable favorite f-bomb-dropping, manspread surviving British actor recently shot a Super Bowl ad for Budweiser that combats drunk driving. And, boy, was it good.

She gets straight to the point:


GIFs via Budweiser/YouTube.

The PSA racked up more than 180,000 views in just the one day after it was posted to YouTube. And it's no mystery why.

There are exactly three reasons this Super Bowl PSA is a total win:

1. Mirren knows the power of being incredibly blunt with a British accent.

2. She really doesn't hold back at all. Like, at all.

3. She brings it back to what's most important — doing what's right for your loved ones, and yourself, and staying away from the driver's seat when you've been drinking.

GIFs via Budweiser/YouTube.

Here's the full text of the PSA:

"Hello. I'm Helen Mirren, a notoriously frank and uncensored British lady. The collective we are dumbfounded that people still drive drunk. So I'll sum it up like this. If you drive drunk, you, simply put, are a short-sighted, utterly useless, oxygen-wasting human form of pollution. A Darwin award-deserving, selfish coward. If your brain was donated to science, science would return it. So stop it. Now the chances are you're a fun, solid, respectable human being. Don't be pillock. Your friends and family thank you. The friends and family of other drivers thank you. Your future self thanks you. This is suppose to be fun. Cheers."

In the time it took Mirren's PSA to garner over 180,000 views, almost 30 people have died from drunk driving — one death every 53 minutes — according to the stats.

Mirren hilariously slamming drunk drivers? That's something we can all get behind. Actual fatalities from drunk driving? Not so funny. On average, 27 people die in the U.S. every day in a crash involving an impaired driver, according to the NHTSA.

Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images.

Maybe the seriousness of the issue is in part why certain anti-drunk driving ads by alcoholic beverage companies are resonating with people.

This isn't the first time Budweiser has used its Super Bowl ad to strike a chord with consumers through a drunk driving PSA. Remember that one with an adorable dog from 2014?

It sent a powerful message to puppy-loving beer drinkers: Crash at a friend's house instead of driving home drunk (and, also, apologize to your pet after doing so).

GIF via Budweiser/YouTube.

But shouldn't all alcoholic beverage companies bear some responsibility in curbing drunk driving?

Plenty of people seem to think so, and that includes Katherine Clegg Smith, the lead author of a 2014 study that found not one of the 1,795 ads for alcoholic beverage in her research gave specifics on how to drink responsibly.

Sure, those ads came with messages like "enjoy in moderation," and "please drink responsibly," but — seeing as consuming alcohol can pose a significant and immediate health risk — shouldn't they be required to go a bit further into detail?

“If you want to warn people against something, you need to be clear about what you’re warning them against and why,” Smith told The Kansas City Star in 2014, noting that health warnings must be specific to actually modify how people think and behave regarding the product.

Mirren's PSA doesn't lay out specifics, but she does spell out what type of person you'll be if you get behind the wheel of a car after drinking.

The next time you even entertain the idea about driving drunk, remember what Helen Mirren thinks of you. Hopefully that'll keep you safe and sound and most importantly off the roads.

Check out Mirren's Budweiser ad below:


Family

I'm staring at my screen watching the President of the United States speak before a stadium full of people in North Carolina. He launches into a lie-laced attack on Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, and the crowd boos. Soon they start chanting, "Send her back! Send her back! Send her back!"

The President does nothing. Says nothing. He just stands there and waits for the crowd to finish their outburst.

WATCH: Trump rally crowd chants 'send her back' after he criticizes Rep. Ilhan Omar www.youtube.com

My mind flashes to another President of the United States speaking to a stadium full of people in North Carolina in 2016. A heckler in the crowd—an old man in uniform holding up a TRUMP sign—starts shouting, disrupting the speech. The crowd boos. Soon they start chanting, "Hillary! Hillary! Hillary!"

Keep Reading Show less
Recommended
via EarthFix / Flickr

What will future generations never believe that we tolerated in 2019?

Dolphin and orca captivity, for sure. They'll probably shake their heads at how people died because they couldn't afford healthcare. And, they'll be completely mystified at the amount of food some people waste while others go starving.

According to Biological Diversity, "An estimated 40 percent of the food produced in the United States is wasted every year, costing households, businesses and farms about $218 billion annually."

There are so many things wrong with this.

First of all it's a waste of money for the households who throw out good food. Second, it's a waste of all of the resources that went into growing the food, including the animals who gave their lives for the meal. Third, there's something very wrong with throwing out food when one in eight Americans struggle with hunger.

Supermarkets are just as guilty of this unnecessary waste as consumers. About 10% of all food waste are supermarket products thrown out before they've reached their expiration date.

Three years ago, France took big steps to combat food waste by making a law that bans grocery stores from throwing away edible food.According to the new ordinance, stores can be fined for up to $4,500 for each infraction.

Previously, the French threw out 7.1 million tons of food. Sixty-seven percent of which was tossed by consumers, 15% by restaurants, and 11% by grocery stores.

This has created a network of over 5,000 charities that accept the food from supermarkets and donate them to charity. The law also struck down agreements between supermarkets and manufacturers that prohibited the stores from donating food to charities.

"There was one food manufacturer that was not authorized to donate the sandwiches it made for a particular supermarket brand. But now, we get 30,000 sandwiches a month from them — sandwiches that used to be thrown away," Jacques Bailet, head of the French network of food banks known as Banques Alimentaires, told NPR.

It's expected that similar laws may spread through Europe, but people are a lot less confident at it happening in the United States. The USDA believes that the biggest barrier to such a program would be cost to the charities and or supermarkets.

"The logistics of getting safe, wholesome, edible food from anywhere to people that can use it is really difficult," the organization said according to Gizmodo. "If you're having to set up a really expensive system to recover marginal amounts of food, that's not good for anybody."

Plus, the idea may seem a little too "socialist" for the average American's appetite.

"The French version is quite socialist, but I would say in a great way because you're providing a way where they [supermarkets] have to do the beneficial things not only for the environment, but from an ethical standpoint of getting healthy food to those who need it and minimizing some of the harmful greenhouse gas emissions that come when food ends up in a landfill," Jonathan Bloom, the author of American Wasteland, told NPR.

However, just because something may be socialist doesn't mean it's wrong. The greater wrong is the insane waste of money, damage to the environment, and devastation caused by hunger that can easily be avoided.

Planet

Policing women's bodies — and by consequence their clothes — is nothing new to women across the globe. But this mother's "legging problem" is particularly ridiculous.

What someone wears, regardless of gender, is a personal choice. Sadly, many folks like Maryann White, mother of four sons, think women's attire — particularly women's leggings are a threat to men.

While sitting in mass at the University of Notre Dame, White was aghast by the spandex attire the young women in front of her were sporting.

Keep Reading Show less
More

Men are sharing examples of how they step up and step in when they see problematic behaviors in their peers, and people are here for it.

Twitter user "feminist next door" posed an inquiry to her followers, asking "good guys" to share times they saw misogyny or predatory behavior and did something about it. "What did you say," she asked. "What are your suggestions for the other other men in this situation?" She added a perfectly fitting hashtag: #NotCoolMan.

Not only did the good guys show up for the thread, but their stories show how men can interrupt situations when they see women being mistreated and help put a stop to it.

Keep Reading Show less
Culture